E-ISSN: 2814 – 1822; P-ISSN: 2616 – 0668
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
1R.S. Dangoggo, 2D.N. Peni, 3S. B Manga, 3UK mohammed and ⁴B. U Bagudo
1Department of Microbiology, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi, Nigeria
2Department of Science Laboratory Technology Kebbi State, Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi, Nigeria
3Department of Microbiology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Sokoto, Nigeria
4Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Sokoto, Nigeria
Correspondong Author: rukayyasd2@gmail.com
Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infections are one of the most common sexually transmitted infections among pregnant women worldwide. This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type-2 among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Maryam Abacha Women and Children's Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria. A total of 200 blood samples were screened for HSV-2 among pregnant women. Socioeconomic factors were obtained from a questionnaire, and IgG/IgM antibodies were determined using an ELISA test kit. The Results have shown a prevalence of 6.59% among pregnant women. There was an association between tribe, religion, sexually transmitted Infection symptoms (STIs), history of genital ulcer, and the prevalence of herpes simplex virus type-2 IgM/IgG antibody. Based on age, all four groups were reactive, with the highest prevalence occurring in the age groups 21-30 years (9.1%), ≤ 20 years (6.1%),≥ 40 years (5.6%), and 31-40 years (2.3%). Based on residence, urban settlers have a higher percentage (7.6%) than rural settlers (4.8%). Those with tertiary education (8.7%) have the highest percentage, followed by those with secondary education (8.2%). These findings make it necessary for all expectant mothers to have a serological test for HSV antibodies to detect early and treat congenital Infections as soon as possible.
KEY WORDS: herpes simplex virus type 2, elisa, pregnant woman and seroprevalance.
Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is an envelope, double-stranded DNA virus. It is a universal virus belonging to the family Herpesviridae (Chayavichitsilp et al., 2009). It is the major cause of genital ulcers worldwide, causing anal and genital infections, and may cause infections in other areas of the body (Chayavichitsilp et al., 2009). Herpes Simplex Virus infection is contracted through direct contact with an active lesion or body fluid of an infected person. It is mostly transmitted through sexual intercourse. (Oluboyo etal., 2020). Clinical manifestations of HSV include: skin and mucous lining infections, genital herpes, herpetic whitlow, herpes encephalitis, cognitive deficits of bipolar disorder, and Alzheimer's disease (Dickerson et al., 2004).
Bujko et al., (2004) reported that Herpes simplex virus-2 is one of the most common and relevant venereal diseases occurring in women. Cusini and Ghislanzoni (2001) reported that the prevalence of HSV infection increases with age, with the highest occurrence among women at 40 years. It has been reported that age, educational status, parity, stage of pregnancy and history of blood transfusion were not significantly associated with the prevalence of HSV infection (Oti et al., 2017).
This infection appears to be related to the number of sexual partners, and with respect to gender, infection is said to be more frequent in women than in men (Smith and Robinson, 2002). Ethnicity, poverty, cocaine abuse, earlier onset of sexual activity, sexual behaviour, and bacterial vaginosis are conditions capable of increasing a woman's possibility of infection before pregnancy (Cherpes et al., 2003). Genital herpes is not routinely diagnosed in the laboratory in Sokoto; hence, delivery of babies by caesarean section is desirable. There is no data to guide HSV-2 prevention efforts like that available for other common Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). Testing for seroprevalence of antibodies to HSV-2 is one way to estimate the seroprevalence of genital herpes in a population. Records are, however, scanty on the seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 among pregnant women in Sokoto State. This triggers the research work to investigate the prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 among pregnant women attending Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto, Sokoto State. To determine the seroprevalence (IgG/IgM) of herpes simplex virus type 2 among pregnant women and to determine the associated risk factors with herpes simplex virus type 2 infections
The study was conducted at Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto, among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic in the hospital. Patients come from different parts of the state to the hospital for medical attention. Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital is located at longitude 5.2460 0E and latitude 13.0522 0N. It is situated on Sultan Bello Road in Sokoto, near the Sokoto old market. The women and children's health-care clinic was built in 1997 and commissioned by Her Excellency, Maryam Sani Abacha, to address health issues that women and children face, such as vesicovaginal fistula (VVF). Since its inception, the hospital has successfully performed surgery in such cases (Lema et al., 2019).
The study was a prospective cross-sectional hospital-based study where blood samples were collected from pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto.
Pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto, were eligible and recruited for the study.
Pregnant women attending Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto, who give consent to participate in the study.
Non-pregnant women, Pregnant women who do not give consent to the study, and Pregnant women who were not attendees of the Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ministry of Health, Sokoto, with a reference number SMH/158/V iv. The study participants were informed about the purpose of the study.
The study includes 200 pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto State. Sample size for the study was determined using the method described by Fischer et al. (2020) in the equation.
N = [Z2 P (1-P)]/D2
Where N = Minimum sample size
Z = confidence interval at 95% (standard value of 1.96)
P = Prevalence rate
D = desire degree of accuracy at 95% confidence level 0.05
To calculate N using the 13% prevalence obtained by WHO (2022)
Therefore
N=[1.962 x 0.13(1- 0.13)]/0.052
n=[3.8416x 0.13(1- 0.13)]/0.0025
n= 173.79
n=174.
The sample size calculated for the entire study population was 174. However, to make a sample size that will give a fair representation of the study population, 200 samples were collected among the pregnant women.
A well-structured questionnaire was used to collect the demographic data of the participants, risk factors, and birth history.
Five (5) ml of venous blood were collected from each of the consenting pregnant women using sterile needles, syringes, and clean sample bottles. Serum was obtained by centrifuging each blood sample at 1000 rpm (revolutions per minute) for 10 minutes. The sera were stored in the Chemical Pathology Laboratory, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, at -20°C until ready for assay (Cheesbrough, 2006).
The serum samples were determined using an ELISA kit (Beijing North Institute of Biotechnology Co. Ltd) following the manufacturer's instructions. The kits were intended for the determination of IgG/IgM class-specific antibodies against HSV-2 in human serum or plasma. The kit uses the capture ELISA principle to detect HSV-2 IgM. Purified anti-human IgM monoclonal antibody was precoated on the microplate. The HSV-2 IgM in the sample combines with the anti-human IgM monoclonal antibody first, then combines with the enzyme-labeled antigen to form an antigen-antibody complex, and shows a blue color in the microplate. The kit was used for the specific detection of HSV-2 IgM antibody in the samples.
The manufacturer’s procedure was strictly followed. The reagents provided were allowed to attain room temperature for 15 minutes before use. The wash buffer was diluted with distilled water at a ratio of 1:40 before use. The microtiter plate was set up with one well as a blank, two wells as negative controls, and two wells as positive controls. 100µl of sample diluents was dispensed into the respective wells except the blank well, negative control well, and positive control well. 100µl of the negative and positive controls were dispensed into their wells, respectively. 10µl of samples were dispensed into their wells and the content was mix by shaking the plate gently for 30 seconds.
The microplate was covered with a sealing paper and incubated in a microplate incubator at 37 °C for 20 minutes. After incubation, the plate cover was removed and discarded. Wash buffer was added to each well for 20 seconds, and this process was repeated 5 times using the washed buffer. After the final washing cycle, the plate was turned over onto blotting paper and tapped to remove any excess. 50µl of conjugate was added to each well except the blank; the microplate was covered with a sealing paper and also incubated in a microplate incubator at 37 °C for 20 minutes. After incubation, the microplate was washed five times with the diluted wash buffer. 50µl of substrate solution A and 50µl of substrate B were added to each well, except the blank well, and then vortexed; the plate was covered and incubated at 37 °C for 10 minutes. 50µl of stop solution was added to each well except the blank well, and it was followed by mixing. The absorbance was read in an ELISA reader machine at a wavelength of 450 nm (Oluboyo et al., 2020).
The kit uses the indirect ELISA principle to detect HSV-2 IgG. Purified HSV-2 antigen was pre-coated on the microplate, the HSV-2 antibody in the sample combines with HSV-2 antigen first, then combines with enzyme-labeled antigen to form antigen-antibody-antibody complex, and shows blue color in the microplate. The kit was used for the specific detection of HSV-2 IgG antibody in the samples.
The manufacturer’s procedure was strictly followed. The reagents provided were allowed to attain room temperature for 15 minutes before use. The wash buffer was diluted with distilled water at a ratio of 1:40 before use. The microtiter plate was set up with one well as a blank, two wells as negative controls, and two wells as positive controls. 100µl of sample diluents was dispensed into the respective wells except the blank well, negative control well, and positive control well. 100µl of the negative and positive controls were dispensed into their wells, respectively. 10µl of samples were dispensed into their wells and the content was mix by shaking the plate gently for 30 seconds.
The microplate was covered with a sealing paper and incubated in a microplate incubator at 37 °C for 20 minutes. After incubation, the plate cover was removed and discarded. Wash buffer was added to each well for 20 seconds, and this process was repeated 5 times using the washed buffer. After the final washing cycle, the plate was turned over onto blotting paper and tapped to remove any excess. 50µl of conjugate was added to each well except the blank; the microplate was covered with a sealing paper and also incubated in a microplate incubator at 37 °C for 20 minutes. After incubation, the microplate was washed five times with the diluted wash buffer. 50µl of substrate solution A and 50µl of substrate B were added to each well, except for the blank well and the mix; the plate was covered and incubated at 37 °C for 10 minutes. 50µl of stop solution was added to each well, except the blank well, and the mixture was gently shaken. The absorbance was read in an ELISA reader machine at a wavelength of 450 nm (Oluboyo et al., 2020).
If the mean negative control O.D. ≤ 0.1 and the mean positive control O.D.≥ 0.8, the test is valid.
Cut-off O.D = the mean O.D value of the negative control × 2.1
Positive results: Sample O.D.≥ cut-off O.D
Negative results: Sample O.D. < cut-off O.D
Seroprevalence of HSV Type 2 IgG/IgM antibody among pregnant women attending Maryam Abacha Women and Children's Hospital was studied in this research. Out of two hundred (200) blood samples collected, only 182 serums were able to be screened for herpes virus antibodies (IgM and IgG). 170 (93.41%) of the serum samples were negative for herpes simplex virus IgM and IgG. The overall positive herpes simplex virus IgM and IgG serum samples were 12 (6.59%). Socioeconomic characteristics associated with HSV Type 2 among pregnant women were presented on the Table. 2. A total of 182 samples were examined, and the prevalence of HSV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies with age was 12 (6.59%). All four age groups were reactive, with the highest prevalence occurring in ages 21-30 years (9.1%), followed by ≤20 (6.1%), ≥40 (5.6%), and 31-40 (2.3%). However, there was no association (X²=0.019, p=0.892) between age and HSV-2 prevalence. Based on religion, higher HSV-2 seroprevalence occurred in subjects practicing Christianity (21.4%) than those practicing Islam (5.4%). However, there is a significant association (X²=5.420, p=0.020) between religion and HSV-2 prevalence. So also, Hausa have the highest proportion of HSV Type 2 IgG/IgM antibody (59.34%), while Igbo have the lowest proportion (1.10%). There is an association among the Igbo pregnant women, with a p-value < 0.05. So, pregnant women living in urban areas have the highest prevalence (7.6%), while those living in rural areas have the lowest prevalence (4.8%).
Table 2: Seroprevalence of HSV Type 2 IgG/IgM among pregnant women based on some sociodemographic factors
Variables | Total n (%) | Positive n (%) | Negative n (%) | χ²-value | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age group (years) | |||||
<20 | 33 (18.13) | 2 (6.1) | 31 (93.9) | 0.019 | 0.892 |
21–30 | 88 (48.35) | 8 (9.1) | 80 (90.9) | 1.726 | 0.189 |
31–40 | 43 (23.63) | 1 (2.3) | 42 (97.7) | 1.665 | 0.197 |
>40 | 18 (9.89) | 1 (5.6) | 17 (94.4) | – | – |
Religion | 5.420 | 0.020 | |||
Islam | 168 (92.31) | 9 (5.4) | 159 (94.6) | ||
Christian | 14 (7.69) | 3 (21.4) | 11 (78.6) | ||
Tribe | 6.187 | 0.013 | |||
Hausa | 108 (59.34) | 5 (4.6) | 103 (95.4) | ||
Yoruba | 12 (6.59) | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | ||
Fulani | 39 (21.43) | 4 (10.3) | 35 (89.7) | ||
Igbo | 2 (1.10) | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | ||
Others | 21 (11.54) | 1 (4.8) | 20 (95.2) | ||
Residence | 0.525 | 0.469 | |||
Rural | 63 (34.62) | 3 (4.8) | 60 (95.2) | ||
Urban | 119 (65.38) | 9 (7.6) | 110 (92.4) |
The seropositivity of HSV-2 IgG/IgM antibody based on occupation and educational level is presented in Table 3. Out of 182 samples examined, the others (9.8%) had a higher prevalence than other occupational groups. Statistically, there was no association (X²=1.186, p=0.276) between occupation and HSV-2 prevalence. Also, the educational level of the pregnant women attending antenatal care was not associated with HSV-2 IgG/IgM prevalence (X²=0.189, p=0.664). A higher prevalence occurred with tertiary education (8.7%) than in other categories of educational level, and the lowest prevalence occurred among illiterates (2.2%).
Table 3: Prevalence of HSV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies among pregnant women based on Occupational and Educational level
Variables | No. of Samples (%) | Positive n (%) | Negative n (%) | χ²-value | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupation | |||||
Housewife | 95 (52.20) | 5 (5.3) | 90 (94.7) | 0.571 | 0.450 |
Civil Servant | 24 (13.19) | 1 (4.2) | 23 (95.8) | 0.264 | 0.607 |
Farming | 12 (6.59) | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.063 | 0.802 |
Others | 51 (28.02) | 5 (9.8) | 46 (90.2) | 1.186 | 0.276 |
Educational Level | |||||
Illiterate | 45 (24.72) | 1 (2.2) | 44 (97.8) | 1.855 | 0.173 |
Primary | 41 (22.53) | 3 (7.3) | 38 (92.7) | 0.045 | 0.832 |
Secondary | 73 (40.11) | 6 (8.2) | 67 (91.8) | 0.523 | 0.470 |
Tertiary | 23 (12.64) | 2 (8.7) | 21 (91.3) | 0.189 | 0.664 |
Risk Factors associated with HSV Type 2 IgG/IgM antibodies among pregnant women are presented in Table 4. Prevalence of HSV Type 2 IgG/IgM antibodies among women based on their gestational period, a higher HSV-2 IgG/IgM prevalence occurred in pregnant women in their third trimester (8.1%) than second and first trimesters. However, no association (X²=0.330, p=0.565) existed between the gestation period and HSV-2 prevalence.
Prevalence of HSV-2 IgG/IgM antibody according to parity is presented in Table 5. Higher HSV-2 IgG/IgM prevalence occurred in those with 3 parity pregnant women (9.4%) than those with 2, 1, and >4 parity had a prevalence rate of 7.4%, 6.3%, and 4.5%, respectively. No Significant association (X²=0.488, p=0.485) between parity and HSV-2 prevalence.
Table4: Prevalence of HSV-2IgG/Ig Mantibodies according to gestational period
Trimester | Number of samples N = 182 (%) | Percentage | X2value | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive (%) | Negative (%) | ||||
First | 36(19.78) | 2(5.6) | 34(94.4) | 0.078 | 0.779 |
Second | 84(46.15) | 5(6.0) | 79(94.0) | 0.104 | 0.747 |
Third | 62(34.07) | 5(8.1) | 57(91.9) | 0.330 | 0.565 |
Total | 182 (100.00) | 12 (6.59) | 170 (93.41) |
Table 5: Prevalence of HSV-2IgG/Ig Mantibody according to parity
Parity | Number of samples N= 182 (%) | Percentage | X2-value | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive (%) | Negative (%) | ||||
1 | 44(24.17) | 2(4.5) | 42(95.5) | 0.395 | 0.530 |
2 | 27(14.84) | 2(7.4) | 25(92.6) | 0.034 | 0.853 |
3 | 32(17.58) | 3(9.4) | 29(90.6) | 0.488 | 0.485 |
>4 | 79(43.41) | 5(6.3) | 74(93.7) | 0.016 | 0.900 |
Total | 182(100.00) | 12(6.59) | 170(93.41) |
The prevalence of genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in pregnant women is a significant concern due to the potential risks it poses to both the fetus and the newborn. HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections can lead to neonatal herpes, which can be severe or even fatal if not properly managed. Therefore, assessing HSV infection in pregnant women is essential for appropriate clinical management and epidemiological tracking.
This study revealed a relatively low prevalence of 6.59% of HSV-2 among pregnant women in Sokoto, Nigeria (6.59%) is notably lower compared to similar studies in other Nigerian States, where seroprevalence rates have been significantly higher. For instance, a study in a tertiary health facility in Keffi, Central Nigeria, reported a seroprevalence of 35.5% (Oti et al., 2017), while another study in Benin, Nigeria, recorded a prevalence of 46.3% (Kalu et al., 2015). Similarly, a study conducted in Ethiopia reported an HSV-2 seroprevalence of 7.8% among antenatal attendees, which aligns closely with this finding. However, differences in testing methods (eg, ELISA & PCR) and sample size may account for minor variations. These variations highlight the diverse epidemiological patterns of HSV-2 across different regions. Furthermore, HSV-2 seroprevalence in other parts of Africa and the Americas is reported to be much higher, with figures ranging from 60 to 90% in various rural and urban populations (Mihret et al., 2002; Fleming et al., 1997).
The higher seroprevalence observed in these regions could be attributed to factors such as more frequent promiscuous sexual behavior, a larger number of sexual partners, and higher rates of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which increase susceptibility to HSV-2 infection. The comparatively lower prevalence in Sokoto could be attributed to cultural practices, levels of sexual education, and healthcare accessibility in the region.
In contrast, studies in some Asian countries show a lower prevalence of HSV-2 infection, with figures ranging from 10 to 30% (Weiss, 2004). In India, a study conducted at a general gynecology clinic found a seroprevalence of 23.3% (Maitra and Gupta, 2007), while a study in Delhi reported 7% and 8.6% in two urban communities (Chawla et al., 2008).
Comparatively, a study from Jigawa, Nigeria, found a prevalence of 18.3% (Amoo et al., 2020), and similar figures have been observed in other Nigerian states, such as Ibadan (33.3%) and Keffi (35.5%) (Anaedobe and Ajani, 2019; Oti et al., 2017). These differences can be attributed to the variations in the local prevalence of the virus, exposure rates, and socio-cultural behaviors related to sexual health.
The 6.59% seroprevalence observed in this study is comparable to that reported in other regions of Nigeria and internationally. For example, a prevalence of 6.1% and 6.7% was found in pregnant women in Kano, Northern Nigeria, and India, respectively (Muhammad et al., 2021; Aaron et al., 2013). However, this study's prevalence is higher than that reported in studies from other regions, such as 2.8% in Porthacourt Nigeria (Okonko et al., 2023), 4.2% in Turkey (Mehmet et al., 2016), and 4.76% in Baghdad (Hussan, 2013). These discrepancies may be influenced by factors such as the rate of exposure to the virus, the local epidemiology of HSV-2, and the immune status of the population.
The highest prevalence was observed among pregnant women aged 21- 30 years (9.1%), while the lowest was among those aged 31-40 years (2.3%). This finding is consistent with studies by Apurba et al. (2013) and Okonko and Cookey (2015), which also reported higher seropositivity in women aged 26 - 30 years. These also corroborate with other studies showing that HSV2 prevalence tends to peak in younger, sexually active women. For example, research in Tanzania reported similar age-related trends, attributing higher prevalence in this age group to increased sexual activity and biological vulnerability to STIs. However, contrary to some previous reports (Cusini and Ghislanzoni, 2001), this study did not find a statistically significant correlation between age and HSV-2 infection. This suggests that infection can occur at any age if there is exposure to the virus, which is supported by the findings of Oti et al. (2017), who reported the highest prevalence of HVS in pregnant women aged less than 20 years and the least in older age groups, 31-40 years.
Regarding sociodemographic factors, our study found no statistically significant correlation between HSV-2 seroprevalence and factors such as place of residence (rural vs. urban), educational level, and occupation. There is a significant association between religion and HSV2 prevalence, with Christians showing a higher prevalence of 21.4% than Muslims, 5.4%. This trend might reflect differences in sexual health education, cultural practices, or socioeconomic factors. Tribal analysis revealed significant prevalence among Igbo women (50%), which could be linked to smaller sample sizes, leading to skewed data. This warrants further investigation with a larger sample size (Chawla et al., 2008). These findings align with those of Rathore et al. (2010), who also reported no significant associations. In contrast, other studies have found significant associations between sociodemographic factors and HSV-2 infection (Chawla et al., 2008).
Results from this study have shown a prevalence of 6.59% of HSV among pregnant women. There was an association between tribe, religion, sexually transmitted Infection symptoms (STIs), history of genital ulcer, and the prevalence of herpes simplex virus type-2 IgM/IgG antibody. The highest prevalence was among women aged 21-30 years (9.1%). Urban settlers had a higher percentage (7.6%), and those with tertiary education had the highest percentage (8.7%). Pregnant women in the third trimester (8.1%) have a higher percentage. Those with parity 3 have the highest percentage, followed by those with parity 2 (7.4%). These findings make it necessary for all expectant mothers to have a serological test for HSV antibodies to detect early and treat congenital Infections as soon as possible.
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are suggested:
It is crucial to implement routine screening for HSV-2 in antenatal care settings. Early detection can help identify at-risk individuals and enable timely interventions to reduce the risk of neonatal transmission.
Awareness campaigns should be launched to educate the general population, especially pregnant women, about the risks of HSV-2. Providing information on preventive measures, such as safe sexual practices, can help reduce the spread of the virus.
Special attention should be given to women with known risk factors for HSV-2, such as a history of genital ulcers, multiple sexual partners, early age of first intercourse, and previous STIs. Tailored interventions, including counseling and appropriate antiviral therapy, could significantly reduce the transmission risk and improve pregnancy outcomes.
Aaron, F. B., Madhivanan, P., Niranjankumar, B., Ravi, K., Arun, A., Krupp, K., & Klausner, J. D. (2013). The epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type-2 infection among pregnant women in rural Mysore Taluk, India. Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2013, Article 750415. [Crossref]
Amoo, F. K., Muhammad, S. N., Gumel, A. M., Eze, L. C., Baita, N., Mukhtar, S. I., & Sani, D. H. (2020). Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 and HIV co-infection among pregnant women in Jigawa State. International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 5(1), 1–6. [Crossref]
Anaedobe, C. G., & Ajani, T. A. (2019). Co-infection of herpes simplex virus type-2 and HIV infections among pregnant women in Ibadan, Nigeria. Global Infectious Disease, 11(1), 19–24. [Crossref]
Apurba, S. S., Sandhya, B. K., Senthamarai, S., Sivasankarai, S., Kumudavathi, M. S., Anitha, C., & Amshavathani, S. K. (2013). Serological evaluation of herpes simplex virus type 1/type 2 infections in pregnant women with bad obstetric history in a tertiary care hospital, Kanchipuram. International Journal of Advance Research, 1, 123–128.
Bochner, A. F., Madhivanan, P., Niranjankumar, B., Ravi, K., Arun, A., Krupp, K., & Klausner, J. D. (2013). The epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type-2 infection among pregnant women in rural Mysore Taluk, India. Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2013, 750415. [Crossref]
Bujko, M., Sulovic, V., Zivanovic, V., Dotlic, R., & Bardic, I. (2004). Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in women with previous spontaneous abortion. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 16(3), 193–196. [Crossref]
Chawla, R., Bhalla, P., Singh, M. M., & Garg, S. (2008). Community-based study on seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in New Delhi. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 26(1), 34–39. [Crossref]
Chayavichitsilp, P., Buckwalter, J. V., Krakowski, A. C., & Friedlander, S. F. (2009). Herpes simplex. Pediatrics in Review, 30(4), 119–130. [Crossref]
Cheesbrough, M. (2006). District laboratory practice in tropical countries, Part 2. Cambridge University Press.
Cherpes, T. L., Meyn, L. A., Krohn, M. A., Lurie, J. G., & Hillier, S. L. (2003). Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 30(10), 797–800. [Crossref]
Cowan, F. M. (2000). Testing for type-specific antibody to herpes simplex virus—implications for clinical practice. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 45(Suppl. 4), 9–13. [Crossref]
Cusini, M., & Ghislanzoni, M. (2001). The importance of diagnosing genital herpes. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 47(1), 9–16. [Crossref]
Dickerson, F. B., Boronow, J. J., Stallings, C., Origoni, A. E., Cole, S., Krivogorsky, B., & Yolken, R. H. (2004). Infection with herpes simplex virus type 1 is associated with cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 55(6), 588–593. [Crossref]
Fischer, T. K., Viboud, C., & Parashar, U. (2007). Hospitalizations and deaths from diarrhea and rotavirus among children younger than 5 years of age in the United States. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 195(8), 1117–1125. [Crossref]
Fleming, D. T., McQuillan, G. M., Johnson, R. E., Nahmias, A. J., Aral, S. O., Lee, F. K., & St. Louis, M. E. (1997). Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(16), 1105–1111. [Crossref]
Hussan, B. M. (2013). Study the prevalence of ACL, APL, CMV, HSV, Rubella and Toxoplasma gondii in aborted women in Baghdad. Medical Journal of Babylon, 10(2), 455–464.
Kalu, E., Ojide, C. K., Chuku, A., Chukwunoye, I. I., Agwu, F. E., Nwadike, V. U., Korie, F. C., & Okafor, G. O. C. (2015). Obstetric outcomes of human herpes virus-2 infection among pregnant women in Benin, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 18(4), 453–461. [Crossref]
Lema, S. Y., Suleiman, J., Rabiatu, M. S., Aisha, U., & Yakubu, M. S. (2019). Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis among pregnant women attending antenatal care (ANC) at Maryam Abacha Women and Children Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research, 6(3), 52–56.
Maitra, N., & Gupta, M. (2007). Seroprevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type-2 infection in a general gynecology clinic. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 275(1), 19–23. [Crossref]
Mihret, W., Rinke de Wit, T. F., Petros, B., Mekonnen, Y., Tsegaye, A., Wolday, D., Beyene, A., Aklilu, M., Sanders, E., & Fontanet, A. L. (2002). Herpes simplex virus type 2 seropositivity among urban adults in Africa: Results from two cross-sectional surveys in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29(3), 175–181. [Crossref]
Muhammad, I. A., Hafiz, T. R., Muhammad, F., & Rogo, L. D. (2021). Seroprevalence and risk factors of herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) infection among HIV-positive patients in a selected teaching hospital in Northern Nigeria. OIRT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 1(2), 51–55.
Narouz, N., Allan, P. S., Wade, A. H., & Wagstaffe, S. (2003). Genital herpes serotyping: A study of the epidemiology and patients' knowledge and attitude among STD clinic attenders in Coventry, UK. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 79(1), 35–41. [Crossref]
National Population Commission (NPC). (2007). Report of Nigeria’s National Population Commission on the 2006 Census. Population and Development Review, 33(1), 1–210.
Okonko, I. O., & Cookey, T. I. (2015). Seropositivity and determinants of immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibodies against herpes simplex virus (HSV) types-1 and -2 in pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 15(3), 737–747. [Crossref]
Okonko, I. O., Awah, A., Omang, P. A., Cookey, T. I., Okonko, B. J., Onu, E. N., Oketah, E. N., Innocent-Adiele, H. C., Adim, C. C., & Amadi, B. O. (2023). Serological evidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 IgM antibody among expectant mothers attending a tertiary health care facility in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Nursing and Health, 6, 442–450. [Crossref]
Oti, V. B., Usman, B. A., Pennap, G. R., & Eno-Ibanga, C. K. (2017). Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type-2 among pregnant women accessing antenatal care in a tertiary healthcare facility in Central Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1(4), 1–6. [Crossref]
Rathore, S., Jamwal, A., & Gupta, V. (2010). Herpes simplex virus type 2: Seroprevalence in antenatal women. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS, 31(1), 11–15. [Crossref]
Smith, J. S., & Robinson, N. J. (2002). Age-specific prevalence of infection with herpes simplex virus types 2 and 1: A global review. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 186(Suppl. 1), S3–S28. [Crossref]
Tideman, R. L., Taylor, J., Marks, C., Seifert, C., Berry, G., Trudinger, B., Cunningham, A., & Mindel, A. (2001). Sexual and demographic risk factors for herpes simplex type 1 and 2 in women attending an antenatal clinic. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 77(6), 413–415. [Crossref]
Weiss, H. (2004). Epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the developing world. Herpes, 11(Suppl 1), 24A–35A.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Herpes simplex virus (HSV): Key facts. who.int