UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research

E-ISSN: 2814 – 1822; P-ISSN: 2616 – 0668

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of Plasmid Curing on Multi-Drug-Resistant Salmonella from Poultry Litter in Nasarawa Town, Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Yakubu Aliyu1*, Chrinius Hammuel2, Ajang Abubakar Yakubu3, and Justina Adegba4

1Department of Applied Biology/Microbiology, School of Applied Sciences, Federal Polytechnic, Nasarawa, Nigeria

2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Federal University Wukari, Tabara State, Nigeria

3Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Corresponding Author: aleeyaqub29@gmail.com.

Abstract

The emergence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria, often mediated by chromosomal or plasmid-borne genes, poses a significant public health concern. This study investigated the impact of plasmid curing on multidrug-resistant Salmonella isolates recovered from poultry litter samples in Nasarawa town, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. A total of 96 poultry litter samples were processed. Using standard microbiological protocols, Salmonella species were isolated, characterised, tested for antibiotic susceptibility, and subjected to plasmid curing. Twenty-three Salmonella isolates were screened against ten commonly used antibiotics using the agar disc diffusion technique. Resistance levels of 56.5%, 43.5%, 34.9%, 39.2%, and 22% were observed for Augmentin, Sparfloxacin, Gentamicin, Co-trimoxazole, and Streptomycin, respectively, indicating that they are multidrug-resistant Salmonella strains. Acridine orange was employed as the curing agent. Notably, all five strains initially resistant to streptomycin became susceptible post-curing. Similarly, all 13 strains resistant to augmentin and 4 out ofthe 9 that were resistant to co-trimoxazole lost resistance after plasmid curing. Additionally, 6 out of 10 sparfloxacin-resistant strains became susceptible post-treatment. These findings suggest that plasmid-mediated mechanisms contribute significantly to multidrug resistance in poultry-derived Salmonella. Further molecular studies are recommended to characterize resistance plasmids and inform policies on prudent antibiotic use in animal husbandry.

Keywords: Plasmid Curing, Multi-drug Resistance, Salmonella, Poultry Litter

INTRODUCTION

Plasmids are autonomously replicating, circular DNA molecules distinct from chromosomal DNA and commonly found in bacterial cells. Although they constitute a small proportion of the total genetic content—typically around 2%—they often carry genes that confer a selective advantage, including antibiotic resistance and metal tolerance (Mayer, 2019; Adeyemo & Onilude, 2019). These mobile genetic elements are key drivers of horizontal gene transfer, facilitating the rapid dissemination of resistance traits within and across bacterial populations (Dasmeh et al., 2015).

Plasmid curing refers to the intentional removal of plasmids from bacterial cells, often using chemical or physical agents (Ozdemir, 2019). This technique is employed to determine the genetic basis of resistance, particularly whether a trait is plasmid-encoded or chromosomally integrated (Ozdemir, 2019). Compounds like acridine orange can inhibit plasmid replication without affecting chromosomal DNA, thereby selectively eliminating plasmids from bacterial cells (Wadud et al., 2013). While the therapeutic application of plasmid-curing agents remains limited, their experimental use provides insights into resistance mechanisms and opens potential avenues for managing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in agricultural and clinical settings (Ijabani et al., 2022).

Multidrug resistance (MDR) in bacteria is a growing concern globally (Wemedo et al., 2022). It can result from the presence of resistance genes on R-plasmids or transposons, overexpression of multidrug efflux pumps, or enzymatic drug deactivation (Bennett, 2018). In the case of zoonotic pathogens such as Salmonella, MDR strains are particularly alarming due to their prevalence in food-producing animals and potential transmission to humans via the food chain (Helal et al., 2019).

Salmonella is recognised as a major foodborne pathogen and a common contaminant in poultry environments (Ibrahim et al., 2019). The bacterium has been frequently isolated from poultry litter, a byproduct widely used as organic fertilizer due to its rich nutrient profile (Wegener et al., 2021; Aires, 2019). Despite its agricultural benefits, poultry litter is also a reservoir for antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistance genes, posing environmental and public health risks (Peng et al., 2017).

The rise in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infections, linked to both increased virulence and resistance, underscores the importance of monitoring MDR strains in poultry systems (Kid et al., 2019). As highlighted by Chander et al. (2017), antibiotic resistance is one of the most pressing health threats of our time, with the potential to reverse decades of medical progress.

This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of plasmid curing in reversing antibiotic resistance among Salmonella isolates obtained from poultry litter in Nasarawa town, thereby providing insights into the molecular basis of resistance in the local agricultural setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Area

This study was conducted in Nasarawa town, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. The town spans approximately 570.4 square kilometres and had a population of 189,835 according to the 2006 census (Abdulkarim et al., 2016). Nasarawa town is located about 105 kilometres from Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory, 37 kilometres from Keffi, and 165 kilometres from Lafia, the capital of Nasarawa State. The geographical coordinates of the study location are approximately 8°21'58" N latitude and 7°5'58" E longitude (Abdulkarim et al., 2016).

Sample Size

The number of poultry litter samples collected was determined using an estimated prevalence rate of 6.7% for Salmonella in poultry litter, as reported by Marik et al. (2022). The sample size was calculated using a standard formula for sample size determination in prevalence studies, as outlined by Naing et al. (2006), which accounts for the expected prevalence, desired precision, and confidence level. Based on this calculation, a total of ninety-six (96) poultry litter samples were collected for the study.

\[n = \frac{z^{2}p(1 - p)}{d^{2}}\]

where; n = sample size

P = Prevalence from a previous study

= 6.7% = 0.067

Z = Standard normal distribution at 95% confidence interval = 1.96

D = Absolute desired precision at 5% = 0.05

Therefore,\(\ \ n = \frac{z^{2}p(1 - p)}{d^{2}}\)

\[n = \frac{{1.96}^{2}x\ 0.067(1 - 0.067)}{{0.05}^{2}}\]

\[n = \frac{3.8416x\ 0.067(1 - 0.933)}{0.0025}\]

\[n = \frac{0.24014}{0.0025}\]

n = 96.01 ~ 96

\[n = 96\]

Sample Collection

A set of 96 poultry litter specimens was methodically gathered from four distinct commercial poultry operations located in Nasarawa town. Written informed consent was secured from all participating farm managers before initiating sample collection. Employing sterile, screw-top containers, samples were obtained using aseptic protocols and promptly conveyed under appropriate conditions to the Microbiology Laboratory within the Applied Biology/Microbiology Department, Federal Polytechnic, Nasarawa, for subsequent microbial analysis.

Isolation of Salmonella Species

Salmonella isolation adhered strictly to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE, 2012) guidelines. One (1) gram of each litter specimen was homogenized in 9 mL of buffered peptone water (BPW) for primary enrichment, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 hours. Next, a 1 mL aliquot from this pre-enriched suspension was inoculated into 10 mL of selenite cysteine broth for selective enrichment, with a further 24-hour incubation at 37 °C. Following enrichment, an inoculating loop was used to streak cultures onto Salmonella-Shigella Agar (SSA) plates. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 hours, plates were inspected for presumptive Salmonella colonies, identified by their translucent, pinkish-red morphology often featuring dark central points. Suspect colonies were purified by sub-culturing onto fresh SSA plates. Resulting pure isolates were maintained on nutrient agar slants for subsequent biochemical characterization and antibiotic susceptibility profiling.

Biochemical Identification and Characterisation of Salmonella Isolates

Presumptive Salmonella identification relied on Gram staining reactions and a standardized battery of biochemical assays: Triple Sugar Iron agar, Sulphide-Indole-Motility (SIM) medium, Methyl Red-Voges Proskauer (MR-VP) tests, citrate utilization, and urease activity.
TSI agar slants, prepared per manufacturer's instructions, were inoculated using stab-and-streak techniques and incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 hours. Salmonella typically produces an alkaline (red) slant and acid (yellow) butt, often with gas formation and a darkened base portion indicating H₂S generation (Cheesbrough, 2010).

SIM medium assessed motility, H₂S production, and indole formation. Tubes were stabbed with pure cultures and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. Diffuse growth radiating from the stab line signified motility, while a black precipitate confirmed H₂S production. Kovac's reagent (3 drops) was added for the indole test; a distinct crimson surface ring denoted a positive reaction (Cheesbrough, 2010).

For the MR-VP test, isolates were grown in MR-VP broth (37 °C, 24 hours). The MR test involved adding methyl red indicator to 1 mL of culture; an immediate red color signified a positive (acidic) result. The VP test used the remaining broth, treated with 5 drops each of 40% KOH and 5% α-naphthol solution. Tubes were gently agitated and observed for up to one hour; development of a red surface ring indicated a positive VP result. Salmonella characteristically exhibits MR-positive and VP-negative reactions (Cheesbrough, 2010). Citrate utilisation was evaluated on Simmons' citrate agar slants. After streaking the slant surface with a sterile needle carrying the test isolate and incubating (37 °C, 24 hours), a distinct blue color change signified positive citrate utilisation, a trait common to Salmonella (Cheesbrough, 2010).

Urease activity was determined by streaking isolates onto urea agar slants and incubating (37 °C, 24 hours. A positive result, indicated by a magenta-pink color throughout the medium, is atypical for Salmonella, which generally yields a negative test (unchanged yellow medium) (Cheesbrough, 2010).

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Confirmed Salmonella Isolates

Inoculum Preparation and Standardisation

Inocula for susceptibility testing were prepared by emulsifying pure Salmonella colonies from nutrient agar in sterile physiological saline (0.85% NaCl). The turbidity of each suspension was meticulously calibrated to the 0.5 McFarland standard (approximating 1.5 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) by adding colonies or saline, ensuring uniform bacterial density essential for reliable sensitivity testing (Cheesbrough, 2010).

Antibiotic Susceptibility Assay

Antimicrobial susceptibility of confirmed Salmonella isolates was determined using the standardized Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols (CLSI, 2017). Ten antimicrobial agents were evaluated: amoxicillin (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (30 µg), gentamicin (30 µg), streptomycin (30 µg), sparfloxacin (10 µg), pefloxacin (30 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanate (10 µg), ofloxacin (10 µg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (30 µg). Standardised suspensions (0.5 mL) were uniformly lawn-cultured onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates using sterile swabs. Antibiotic discs were aseptically applied to the inoculated surfaces. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Inhibition zone diameters surrounding each disc were measured precisely using a calibrated ruler. Results were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant based on established CLSI interpretive criteria (CLSI, 2017). Isolates demonstrating resistance to three or more distinct antimicrobial classes were designated as multidrug-resistant (MDR), per Intrakamhaeng and Komutarin (2012).

Plasmid Curing and Post-curing Antibiotic Sensitivity Evaluation

Plasmid elimination was attempted using an acridine orange-based method adapted from Raghada et al. (2013). Cultures (10 mL) were exposed to peptone water supplemented with 20 µL of acridine orange solution and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Subsequently, 1 mL aliquots from each treated culture were spread onto nutrient agar plates and incubated again (37°C, 24 hours) to recover potentially cured derivatives.

Candidate cured colonies were subcultured onto fresh Mueller-Hinton agar (devoid of curing agents). The antibiotic discs corresponding to the isolate's initial resistance profile were reapplied. After incubation (37°C, 24 hours), inhibition zones were remeasured to assess any alteration in susceptibility patterns potentially resulting from plasmid loss.

RESULTS

Seven (7) out of the 24 samples collected from Oversea were found to have Salmonella giving a prevalence of 29.2%. The percentage occurrence of Salmonella in samples collected from Tammah, Mangoro Goma, and Gunki was 16.7, 25.0, and 25.0, respectively. Despite the differences in percentage occurrence, no statistically significant relationship (X2 = 0.224) was found between the occurrence of Salmonella in the poultry droppings and the different areas sampled using chi-square (Table 1).

Table 1: Occurrence of Salmonella in Poultry Litter in Areas sampled

Location No. Examined No. Positive % Occurrence χ²-Value
Oversea 24 7 29.2%
Tammah 24 4 16.7%
Mangoro Goma 24 6 25.0%
Gunki 24 6 25.0% 0.244
Total 96 23 23.9%

No. = Number

The results of the antibiotic susceptibility tests of the Salmonella isolates obtained are presented in Table 2. Among these isolates, 13 (56.5%) were resistant to Augmentin; 10 (43.5%) were resistant to amoxicillin and sparfloxacin, respectively; and 9 (39.1%) were resistant to co-trimoxazole. However, 9(39.1%) of the isolates were susceptible to streptomycin, 8(34.9%) to gentamicin, and 7(30.4%) to pefloxacin.All of the Salmonella isolates are multidrug-resistant strains as they have demonstrated resistance to more than three antibiotic classes.

Table 2: Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Salmonella from Poultry Litter in Nasarawa Town

N= 23
Antibiotic Conc. (µg) S (%) I(%) R (%)
Amoxicillin 30 3(13.0) 10(43.5) 10(43.5)
Chloramphenicol 30 3(13.0) 16(69.5) 4(17.4)
Ciprofloxacin 30 0(0.00) 21(91.3) 2(8.7)
Gentamicin 30 8(34.9) 7(30.4) 8(34.9)
Streptomycin 30 9(39.1) 9(39.1) 5(22.0)
Sparfloxacin 10 0(0.00) 13(56.5) 10(43.5)
Pefloxacin 30 7(30.4) 12(52.2) 4(17.4)
Augmentin 10 5(21.7) 5(21.7) 13(56.5)
Ofloxacin 10 4(17.4) 15(65.2) 4(17.4)
Co-trimoxazole 30 7(30.4) 7(30.4) 9(39.1)

N = Number, Conc. = Concentration, S = Susceptibility, 1 =Intermediate, R= Resistance

All of the 10(43.5%), 2(8.7%) 8(34.9%) and 9(39.1%) Salmonella isolates that were initially resistant to sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and co-trimoxazole respectively became susceptible to the antibiotics after plasmid curing. However, only 5 (38.5%) out of the 13 isolates that were resistant to augmentin became susceptible to the drug after plasmid curing (Table 3).

Table 3: Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of the Multi-Drug-Resistant Salmonella after Plasmid Curing

Antibiotic Conc. (µg) Resistance Before Curing (No. of Isolates) Resistance After Curing (No. of Isolates)
Sparfloxacin 10 10 None
Ciprofloxacin 30 2 None
Gentamicin 30 8 None
Co-trimoxazole 30 9 None
Augmentin 10 13 5

DISCUSSION

This study revealed that 23 out of 96 poultry litter samples (23.9%) were contaminated with Salmonella species (Table 1). This prevalence presents a significant public health concern, given the widespread use of poultry litter as organic fertiliser. Although beneficial for agriculture, poultry litter can serve as a vector for the transmission of enteric pathogens such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter (Helal et al., 2019; Ijabani et al., 2022). When applied to farmlands, contaminated litter may lead to crop contamination and contribute to outbreaks of foodborne illnesses (Hruby et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019). Furthermore, runoff from fields treated with such litter can introduce Salmonella into nearby water bodies (Shepherd et al., 2015; You et al., 2018).Similar findings were reported by Jemilehin et al. (2015) and Omoya et al. (2016) in Akure, Nigeria, where poultry litter was found to harbour pathogenic bacteria posing considerable health risks.

The 23.9% prevalence in this study is notably higher than the 17.7% and 14.4% reported by Bushen et al. (2021) and Waktole et al. (2024), respectively, in various regions of Ethiopia. This variation may stem from differences in poultry management practices, environmental conditions, and hygiene standards, all of which influence Salmonella contamination rates.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed high resistance rates to augmentin (56.5%) and amoxicillin (43.5%), potentially due to the unregulated and indiscriminate use of these antibiotics in poultry farming. Such practices create selective pressure that facilitates the emergence of resistant strains. The absence of robust antibiotic stewardship or regulatory frameworks likely exacerbates this issue. Furthermore, resistance to one β-lactam antibiotic often confers cross-resistance to other β-lactams due to structural and mechanistic similarities. The observed amoxicillin resistance (43.5%) is lower than the 73.3% reported by Samy et al. (2022) in Egypt, and significantly lower than the 100% resistance observed by Talukder et al. (2021), underscoring geographical disparities in antibiotic usage and resistance dynamics.

Interestingly, 34.9% of isolates were resistant to gentamicin, contrasting with the 26.7% reported by Waktole et al. (2024). Since gentamicin is not commonly used in poultry production in Nigeria, this resistance may be attributed to environmental contamination with gentamicin-resistant Salmonella strains of human origin. Similarly, resistance levels of 39.1% to co-trimoxazole and 43.5% to sparfloxacin—despite limited or no usage in poultry—suggest the introduction of resistant strains via indirect environmental routes, such as contaminated water or waste.

Crucially, all Salmonella isolates exhibited multidrug resistance (MDR), defined as resistance to three or more antibiotic classes (Magiorakos et al., 2012). This aligns with findings by Helmuth and Fashae (2018) in Ibadan, Nigeria. The presence of MDR Salmonella in poultry waste is alarming, as such strains can enter the human food chain and cause infections that are difficult to treat, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality risks.

Plasmid curing experiments further demonstrated that resistance to sparfloxacin, co-trimoxazole, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin was plasmid-mediated. The fact that isolates previously resistant to these antibiotics became susceptible post-curing confirms this mechanism. The use of acridine orange, an intercalating agent, successfully eliminated plasmid-mediated resistance, underscoring its potential utility in managing antibiotic resistance.

These findings emphasize the urgent need for regulatory control over antibiotic use in animal husbandry. The demonstrated effectiveness of plasmid curing supports its potential as a research tool in combating antibiotic resistance. Consistent with earlier reports (Zhang et al., 2012; Barika et al., 2024), the results confirm that acquired (rather than induced) resistance mechanisms were involved. This also validates those certain injectable antibiotics may retain efficacy if their resistance genes are not chromosomally encoded (Guillermo et al., 2012).

CONCLUSION

This study identified a 23.9% prevalence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in poultry droppings, highlighting serious public health risks associated with the use of untreated poultry litter as fertilizer. The isolates showed resistance to multiple antibiotics, including augmentin, amoxicillin, sparfloxacin, co-trimoxazole, and gentamicin. Significantly, the use of acridine orange successfully reversed resistance, demonstrating that the antibiotic resistance in these strains was plasmid-mediated. These findings underscore the need for proper composting of poultry litter before use in agriculture, as well as public awareness campaigns on the dangers of indiscriminate antibiotic use. Enhanced antibiotic stewardship, along with sound regulatory policies, is essential to prevent further escalation of antibiotic resistance. In the long term, such interventions will be critical in preserving the effectiveness of existing antibiotics and protecting both human and animal health.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists regarding the publication of this study.

REFERENCES

Abdulkarim, N., Umar, K., Bori, I., & Abubakar, M. (2016). Characterisation and management of solid waste generated in Nasarawa Local Government Area, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 24(4), 1128–1134.

Adeyemo, S., & Onilude, A. (2015). Plasmid curing and its effect on the growth and physiological characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from fermented cereals. Journal of Microbiology Research, 5(1), 11–22.

Aires, R. (2019). Composting of chicken litter from commercial broiler farms reduces the abundance of viable enteric bacteria, Firmicutes, and selected antibiotic resistance genes. Science of the Total Environment, 746, 141113. [Crossref]

Barika, P. N., Sampson, T., Akan, N. P., Ogbuleka, N. A. C., & Chuku, W. (2024). Screening for resistance genes and plasmid curing profile reagents of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes from seafood sold in Rivers State, Nigeria. South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology, 18(9), 10–20. [Crossref]

Bennett, P. M. (2018). Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: Acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. British Journal of Pharmacology, 153(1), 347–357. [Crossref]

Bushen, A., Tekalign, E., & Abayneh, M. (2021). Drug- and multidrug resistance patterns of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from droppings of healthy chickens on a poultry farm in Southwest Ethiopia. Infection and Drug Resistance, 14, 2051–2058. [Crossref]

Chander, Y., Gupta, S. C., & Goyal, S. M. (2007). Antibiotics: Has the magic gone? Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87, 739–742. [Crossref]

Cheesbrough, M. (2010). District laboratory manual for tropical countries (Low Price Edition). Cambridge University Press.

Chen, Z., Biswas, S., Aminabadi, P., Stackhouse, J. W., Jay-Russell, M. T., & Pandey, P. K. (2019). Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella spp. in solid bovine manure in California using real-time quantitative PCR. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 69(1), 23–31.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2017). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (27th ed.). CLSI

Dasmeh, M., Baserisalehi, M., & Emami, A. (2015). Plasmid curing assay in clinical isolates of antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiology Journal, 5, 43–48. [Crossref]

Doyle, M. P., Erickson, M. C., & Barco, L. (2018). The problems with fresh produce: An overview. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 105, 317–330. [Crossref]

Ezekiel, C. N., Olarinmoye, A. O., Oyinloye, J. M., Olaoye, O. B., & Edun, A. O. (2017). Distribution, antibiogram, and multidrug resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from commercial poultry feeds in Nigeria. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 5(3), 294–301.

Guillermo, V. S., Ronald, N. M., & Jose, M. B. (2012). In vitro antimicrobial resistance of urinary Escherichia coli isolates among U.S. outpatients from 2000–2010. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 56(4), 2181–2183. [Crossref]

Helal, G., Tarabees, R., & Younis, G. (2019). Molecular characterisation of virulence genes associated with Salmonella species isolated from poultry. Journal of Current Veterinary Research, 2, 36–46. [Crossref]

Helmuth, R., & Fashae, K. (2018). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella serovars from chickens and humans in Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Infections in Developing Countries, 4(8), 484–494. [Crossref]

Hruby, C., Soupir, M., Moorman, T., Pederson, C., & Kanwar, R. (2018). Salmonella and fecal indicator bacteria survival in soils amended with poultry manure. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2(5), 229–379. [Crossref]

Ibrahim, T., Ngwai, Y. B., Pennap, G. R. I., Ishaleku, D., Tsaku, P. A., Abimiku, R. H., Nkene, I. H., & Bassey, E. B. (2019). Prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium from commercial poultry and handlers in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 3(2), 370–375.

Ijabani, E., Salihu, A., & Pola, B. J. (2022). Antibiotic resistance patterns and plasmid curing of Escherichia coli isolated from soil samples in Girei, Nigeria. Asian Soil Research Journal, 6(2), 1–8. [Crossref]

Intrakamhaeng, M. Z., & Komutarin, T. (2012). Antibiogram reporting: Principles and practice. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 95(6), 732–738.

Jemilehin, F. O., Ogunleye, A. O., Okunlade, A. T., & Juwape, P. A. (2015). Isolation of Salmonella species and some other Gram-negative bacteria from rats cohabitating with poultry in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. African Journal of Microbiological Research, 10(29), 1104–1110. [Crossref]

Kid, K. W., Lillehoj, H. S., Lee, S. H., & Nomura, T. (2019). Impact of fresh or used litter on the post-hatch immune system of commercial broilers. Avian Disease, 55, 539–544. [Crossref]

Magiorakos, J. F., Kahlmeter, G., Olsson-Liljequist, B., Paterson, D. L., Rice, L. B., Stelling, J., Struelens, M. J., Vatopoulos, A., Weber, J. T., & Monnet, D. L. (2012). Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 18, 268–281. [Crossref]

Marik, C. M., Aminabadi, P., Gartely, G., Ramos, T., Kniel, K. E., Strawn, L. K., & Rahn, K. (2022). Development and evaluation of a streamlined method for the enumeration of Salmonella in poultry manure. Journal of Food Microbiology, 6, 271–279.

Mayer, L. W. (2019). Use of plasmid profiles in epidemiologic surveillance of disease outbreaks in tracing the transmission of antibiotic resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 1(2), 228–243. [Crossref]

Naing, L., Winn, T., & Rusli, B. N. (2006). Sample size calculation for prevalence studies. usmmyppsgtats_resources.htm

Office International des Epizooties (OIE). (2012). Fowl typhoid and pullorum disease. In Terrestrial manual (pp. 3–5).

Omoya, F. O., & Ajayi, K. O. (2016). Antibiotic resistance pattern of pathogenic bacteria isolated from poultry droppings in Akure, Nigeria. FUTA Journal of Research in Sciences, 12(2), 219–227.

Ozdemir, K. (2019). Curing the drug resistance plasmid in E. coli O157:H7. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2(6), 14715–14727. [Crossref]

Peng, S., Feng, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in soils after continually applied with different manure for 30 years. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 340, 16–25. [Crossref]

Raghada, M., Munera, I., & Ayad, F. (2013). Detection of plasmid DNA profile in bacterial and fungal isolates from catheterized patients and its relation with antibiotic susceptibility. Journal of Biotechnology Research Centre, 7, 51–60. [Crossref]

Samy, A. A., Arafa, A. A., Hedia, R. H., & Ibrahim, E. S. (2022). Multiple drug resistance Salmonella and antibiotic residues in Egyptian animal products. World's Veterinary Journal, 12(4), 363–373. [Crossref]

Shepherd, M. W., Liang, P., Jiang, X., Doyle, M. P., & Erickson, M. C. (2019). Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during on-farm dairy manure-based composting. Journal of Food Protection, 70(3), 2708–2716. [Crossref]

Talukder, M., Islam, M. S., Ievy, S., Sobur, M. A., Ballah, F. M., Nabibullah, M., Rahman, M. B., Rahman, M. T., & Khan, M. F. R. (2021). Detection of multidrug resistant Salmonella species from healthy and diseased broilers having potential public health significance. Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Therapeutics, 4(2), 248–255. [Crossref]

Wadud, S., Michaelsen, A., & Gallagher, E. (2013). Bacterial and fungal community composition over time in chicken litter with high or low moisture content. British Poultry Science, 53, 561–569. [Crossref]

Waktole, H., Ayele, Y., Ayalkibet, Y., Teshome, T., Muluneh, T., Ayane, S., Borena, B. M., Abayneh, T., Deresse, G., Asefa, Z., Eguale, T., Amenu, K., Ashenafi, H., & Gunther, A. G. (2024). Prevalence, molecular detection, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates from poultry farms across central Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study in urban and peri-urban areas. Microorganisms, 12, 767. [Crossref]

Wegener, F., Studholme, D. J., Eeckhau, V., & Titball, R. W. (2021). Salmonella Gallinarum field isolates from laying hens are related to the vaccine strain SG9R. Vaccine, 31, 4940–4945. [Crossref]

Wemedo, S. A., Akani, N. P., & Akintola, A. A. (2022). Molecular characterisation and plasmid curing of multidrug-resistant enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli isolated from some faecal and water samples in Port Harcourt metropolis. South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology, 14(3–4), 1–10. [Crossref]

You, Y., Rankin, S. C., Aceto, H. W., Benson, C. E., Toth, J. D., & Dou, Z. (2018). Survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport in manure and manure-amended soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(5), 5777–5783. [Crossref]

Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Deng, X., & Xu, J. (2012). Evaluation of a novel plasmid curing reagent, acridine orange, for Vibrio species. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 55(5), 404–409.