E-ISSN: 2814 – 1822; P-ISSN: 2616 – 0668
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Isyaka M. Tom1, 2*, Usman A. Dutsinma1, Aishatu A. Ibrahim1, Askira M. Umoru2, Muhammad M. Ibrahim3, Jidda B. Umar4
1Medical Microbiology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Bayero University Kano. Nigeria
2Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria
3Department of Microbiology, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria
4Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
Corresponding Author: Isyaka Tom Mohammed
2Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of
Maiduguri, Nigeria
Email Address: isyakatom77@gmail.com
Phone no:08020404592
Proteus species are rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacteria that cause opportunistic infections in the urinary tract and occasionally in the gastrointestinal tract. They are implicated in infections like cystitis and pyelonephritis, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, and are frequently present in cases of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Herein, we aimed to investigate the co-occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) enzyme production and multidrug resistance (MDR) among Proteus spp. Isolated from patients attending selected hospitals in Northeastern Nigeria. A total of 1,500 clinical samples from consenting patients across six states in the Northeastern region of Nigeria were collected. The samples were cultured on Blood agar, and growth resembling that of Proteus species were again subcultured onto MacConkey agar to obtain discrete colonies, further confirmed using biochemical tests. Antibiotics susceptibility test was carried out for all isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, coupled with a screening of the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase using the Combined Disc Diffusion Method. Of the 1500 samples collected, 144 yielded positive growth for Proteus spp., resulting in a prevalence rate of 9.60%. Among these Proteus isolates, three species were identified, with Proteus mirabilis (90.97%) being the most abundant, followed by Proteus vulgaris (8.33%) and Proteus penneri (0.70%). The Proteus isolates displayed significant resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, with a Mean ± SD of 96.64 ± 22.73. A substantial portion of the Proteus spp. Isolated exhibited multidrug resistance (87.89%), with Proteus mirabilis (82.27%) being the most prevalent MDR species. Moreover, about 71.0% of the Proteus spp were ESBL producers, with Proteus mirabilis (64.54%) being the most predominant. Furthermore, 67.38% of all isolates exhibited MDR and ESBL production, and Proteus mirabilis (62.41%) was the most significant among the three Proteus species. These findings highlight the occurrence of multidrug resistance and ESBL production among Proteus spp. in Northeastern Nigeria, with Proteus mirabilis particularly noteworthy. This information is crucial for guiding clinical decision-making, especially in managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant and ESBL-producing Proteus strains.
Keywords: Proteus species, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, Multidrug resistance, hospitals
Human populations from time immemorial have been significantly faced with infectious diseases, which cause immeasurable morbidity and death. The discovery of antibiotics at the beginning brings lots of expectations and hopes to see the end of effectively tackling this menace (Ribeiro da Cunha et al., 2019). However, antibiotic resistance, defined as the ability of microbes to withstand the effects of drugs formulated to prevent and restrain their growth or kill them (CDC, 2021), soon became a challenge. Bacteria have shown the capacity to evolve and develop antibiotic resistance (Davies, 1994; Tenover, 2001; Livermore, 2003). The situation even became worse due to poorly regulated antibiotic use, inadequate surveillance and misuse of antibiotics in clinical medicine and the livestock industry, resulting in the emergence and spread of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria worldwide (Medina and Pieper, 2016; Cerceo et al., 2016; WHO, 2019; Pacios et al., 2020).
Beta-lactam antibiotics possess a beta–lactam ring and are one of the most commonly prescribed worldwide due to their efficacy, broad spectrum, and low toxicity (Oberoi et al., 2013). Resistance to this very important group of antibiotics is pervasive, further constricting the therapeutic options available (Versalovic et al., 2011). The Resistance mechanisms encompass various factors, one of the most crucial being the production of enzymes encoded by specific genes carried on bacterial plasmids, including β-lactamase and extended-spectrum β-lactamase. The prevalence of MDR bacterial strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) has been on the rise in recent years, particularly affecting the prognosis and survival of hospitalized patients in developing countries such as Nigeria (Senthamarai et al., 2015; Tom et al., 2018).
Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) have emerged as a significant resistance mechanism against cephalosporins and other β-lactam antibiotics, primarily in Gram-negative bacteria, especially those of the Enterobacteriaceae family such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Proteus spp (Mendelson et al., 2005; Paterson and Bonomo, 2005; Falagas and Karageorgopoulos, 2009), and other bacterial species such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Jacoby and Munoz-Price, 2005). ESBLs are often plasmid-mediated and can hydrolyze and inactivate a wide range of β-lactam antibiotics, including various Penicillins, broad-spectrum cephalosporins, and monobactams. They are generally derived from Temorina (TEM) and sulfhydryl variable (SHV) type enzymes (Lautenbach et al., 2001).
Proteus species, like many other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, can harbor numerous plasmids and integrons housing genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance (Tom et al., 2018). Different kinds of infectious diseases such as cystitis, pyelonephritis, prostatitis, chronic otitis media, eye infections, respiratory tract infections (RTI), wound infections, burn infections, and bloodstream infections are in some cases linked to pathogenic Proteus (Stock, 2003). Treating such infections can be challenging if the etiologic agent happens to be multidrug resistant ESBL-producing phenotype. In this study, we aim to describe the prevalence of MDR and ESBL production by Proteus spp. circulating in hospitals in the Northeastern region of Nigeria. The data generated from this study can be valuable to clinical microbiologists, clinicians, and infection control professionals. It can also be used for empirical treatment in areas with limited laboratory services.
The study focused on patients receiving care at six healthcare facilities in the North-eastern part of Nigeria, catering to a population exceeding 40 million across six states (Borno, Bauchi, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, and Gombe) and including a significant number from neighboring Cameroon, Chad, and Niger Republic (Umar et al., 2016).
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the hospitals while patients’ informed consent was sought before demographic data and sample collection. All experiments have been examined and approved by the ethics committee of the various Hospitals management and co-signed by the State Ministries of Health.
A total of 1,500 clinical samples were randomly collected from consented patients from six (6) states of the North-eastern region, including wounds, sputum, urine, ear, catheter tip, genital swabs, and stools. Two hundred and fifty (250) samples each were collected from six (6) hospitals, which comprised of the following: Abubakar Tafawa Balewa Teaching Hospital (ATBU-TH), Bauchi, State Specialist Hospital, Maiduguri (SSH MAID), Federal Medical Centre, Yola (FMC Yola), State Specialist Hospital, Damaturu (SSH DMT), Federal Medical Centre, Jalingo (FMC Jalingo), and Federal Medical Centre, Gombe (FMC Gombe). Demographic data was collected and recorded before sample collection from patients.
The 1,500 clinical samples were processed and inoculated on to 5% Blood agar, MacConkey agar, and Cystine Lactose-Electrolyte-Deficient (CLED) and incubated aerobically at 37oC for 18-24 hours (Chessbrough, 2006; Baker et al., 2007). Colonies with characteristic colonial morphology were subcultured onto MacConkey agar to obtain discrete colonies. Following the gram staining technique, the pure cultures of Proteus spp were identified using morphological appearance, swarming motility on Blood agar, Secondary Gram stain reaction for confirmation of characteristic colonies, and biochemical tests, which included phenylalanine deamination, urease production, sugar fermentation on Triple Sugar Ion (TSI) Agar, indole, Methyl Red, Voges Proskauer, Citrate utilization test and Ornithine Decarboxylase est (Chessbrough, 2006; Baker et al., 2007).
A few colonies of pure isolates of Proteus spp cultured on an agar plate were picked with a sterile wire loop and placed into a tube containing sterile normal saline and homogenized to give a turbid solution which was compared to the Mcfarland turbidity scale by continuously adjusting the turbidity until turbidity equals to 0.5 Mcfarland turbidity scale (Ejikeugwu, 2023). This turbidity scale was prepared by adding 0.6 ml of 1% aqueous solution of barium chloride in 99.4 ml of 1% sulphuric acid, giving an approximate bacterial density of 1.5 x 108 cfu/ml (Cheesbrough, 2006).
The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, outlined by Akubuenyi et al. (2011), was employed in this assessment. Pure Proteus spp isolates were examined against a range of commonly Zprescribed antibiotics in the region. The antibiotic discs contained varied concentrations: Cephalexin (10μg), Gentamicin (10μg), Augmentin (30/10µg), Amoxicillin (30μg), Ceftriaxone (30μg), Ceftazidime (30μg), cefotaxime (30μg), Meropenem (30μg), Ertapenem (30μg), Aztreonam (30μg), Nalidixic acid (30μg), Streptomycin (30μg), Norfloxacin (30μg), Ofloxacin (30μg), Pefloxacin (10μg), Ciprofloxacin (10μg), Levofloxacin (10μg), Chloramphenicol (10μg), Rifampicin (10μg), Erythromycin (10μg), Ampiclox (30μg), Ampicillin (30μg), and Cotrimoxazole (30μg) (Fondoz laboratories, Nigeria; Oxoid Limited, UK).
The 0.5 McFarland standardized Proteus spp inoculum containing 1.5 X 108 cfu/mL was inoculated onto Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) plates, maintaining aseptic conditions, and allowed to absorb at room temperature for two minutes. Subsequently, commercially obtained antibiotic discs were meticulously positioned on the plate surface using sterile forceps. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Post-incubation, the zones of inhibition were measured precisely in millimeters. The inhibition zones were interpreted using the CLSI manual (CLSI, 2023).
Determination of Multidrug-resistant Proteus spp
The determination of MDR among Proteus spp was done according to the definition proffered by Magiorakos et al. (2012). MDR was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories or classes.
Proteus spp were screened for ESBL production following CLSI's (2023) recommendations. A prepared inoculum was flooded onto Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) plates and left to absorb at 37°C for two minutes. Antibiotic discs containing Ceftriaxone (30μg), Ceftazidime (30μg), and Cefotaxime (30μg) were then carefully placed on the seeded plate using sterile forceps. After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, inhibition zones were measured. Isolates showing ≤ 25 mm (Ceftriaxone), ≤ 22 mm (Ceftazidime), and ≤ 27 mm (Cefotaxime) were considered suspected ESBL producers.
The Combined Disc Diffusion Method recommended by CLSI (2023) was also employed. A 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard suspension was prepared from MDR Proteus spp colonies, creating a lawn culture on MHA plates. Discs of Ceftazidime and Ceftazidime + Clavulanic acid (30µg/10µg) were aseptically placed on the MHA surface with a 15 mm distance between them. After overnight incubation at 37°C, an increase of ≥ 5 mm in the zone diameter of Ceftazidime + Clavulanic acid compared to Ceftazidime alone confirmed ESBL production by the isolates.
The data were analyzed utilizing the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 21.0) and presented in frequencies and percentages. Chi-square analysis was employed, conducting 99% confidence level evaluations, with statistical significance set at P<0.01.
One thousand and five hundred samples were collected from patients attending selected Hospitals in the North-Eastern states of Nigeria, comprising of State Specialist Hospital (SSH), Maiduguri, SSH, Damaturu, Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Yola, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa Teaching Hospital (ATBU-TH), Bauchi, FMC, Gombe and FMC, Jalingo, and examined for pathogenic Proteus species. The clinical samples collected from patients for the study include, Wound swabs, urine, Ear swabs, Catheter tips, Sputum, Faeces, Genital swabs and Body fluids. Out of the 1500 samples collected, 144 were positive for Proteus infections, with a prevalence rate of 9.6% (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Overall occurrence of Proteus spp Proteus spp from various hospitals across North-eastern Nigeria
The highest infections rate was recorded among patients attending State Specialist Hospital (SSH), Maiduguri, with 31 (2.07%), followed by FMC, Gombe 27 (1.80%), SSH, Damaturu 26 (1.73%), ATBU-TH, Bauchi 21 (1.40%), FMC, Yola 20 (1.33%) and the least FMC, Jalingo with 19 (1.27%) (Table 1). Out of the three pathogenic species of Proteus isolated, P. mirabilis gave the highest yield of 131 (8.73%), followed by P. vulgaris 12 (0.80%), and the least was P. penneri with 1 (0.07%) (Table 2).
Table 1: Occurrence of Proteus spp from various hospitals across the North-eastern Nigeria
Hospital | Number of Samples collected | No. positive | Occurrence (%) |
---|---|---|---|
SSH Maiduguri | 250 | 31 | 2.07 |
FMC Yola | 250 | 20 | 1.33 |
SSH DMT | 250 | 26 | 1.73 |
ATBU-TH Bauchi | 250 | 21 | 1.40 |
FMC Gombe | 250 | 27 | 1.80 |
FMC Jalingo | 250 | 19 | 1.27 |
Total (%) | 1500 | 144 | 9.60 |
(X2= 5.740, df = 10, p-value = 0.837)
Table 2: Distribution of Proteus species isolates from sampled hospitals in North-eastern Nigeria
Proteus spp | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Proteus mirabilis | 131 | 90.97 |
Proteus vulgaris | 12 | 8.33 |
Proteus penneri | 1 | 0.70 |
Total | 144 | 100 |
The demographic distribution of Proteus infections among patients in the study area revealed that Proteus infection was highest among males, 81 (56.25%), compared to females, their counterpart with 63 (43.75%) (p=0.728). Patients within the age category of 31-40 years recorded the highest infection rate of 30 (20.83%), followed by those aged 21 and 30 years with 27 (18.75%), and the least were patients within the age category of >60 years 13 (9.03%) (Table 3).
Table 3: Relationship between and Age and Gender of patients in the Distribution of Proteus spp in North-eastern Nigeria
Age Group (years ) |
Gender | Total (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Male (% ) | Female(% ) | ||
0 10 | 11 (7.64) | 7 (4.86) | 18 (12.50) |
11 20 | 9 (6.25) | 7 (4.86) | 16 (11.11) |
21 - 30 | 15 (10.42) | 12 (8.33) | 27 (18.75) |
31 40 | 16 (11.11) | 14 (9.72) | 30 (20.83) |
41 50 | 12 (8.33) | 14 (9.72) | 26 (1.8.06) |
51 60 | 8 (5.56) | 6 (4.17) | 14 (9.72) |
>60 | 10 (6.94) | 3 (2.08) | 13 (9.03) |
Total (%) | 81 (56.25) | 63 (43.75) | 144 (100.0) |
(X2 =3.621, df =6, P- value 0.728)
The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Proteus spp isolated showed the highest resistance against all the β-lactam antibiotics used in this study, except for Meropenem, which proved moderately sensitive with 97 (67.36). The highest resistance of Proteus species was recorded against Ampicillin 122 (84.72%), followed by Amoxicillin, Ceporexin, and Cefotaxime with 116 (80.56%) each. Resistance against other groups of antibiotics stood at 188 (81.94%), 115 (79.86%), 74 (51.39%), and 71 (49.31%) to Nalidixic acid, Norfloxacin, Chloramphenicol, and Erythromycin respectively. Proteus species isolated were highly susceptible to Levofloxacin 126 (87.50%) and Ciprofloxacin 105 (72.92%), while exhibited intermediate sensitivity pattern to Rifampicin 86 (59.72%) and Streptomycin 75 (54.86%) (Table 4). The frequency of isolation of multi-drug resistant Proteus spp from samples collected in the selected Hospitals showed that patients attending SSH, Maiduguri, recorded the highest rate of isolation, 26 (20.60), and the least was found among patients who attended FMC, Yola, and ATBU-TH, Bauchi with17 (13.60) each (Table 5).
Table 4: Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Proteus spp isolated from patients attending sampled hospitals in North-eastern Nigeria
Antimicrobial Agents tested |
Susceptibility pattern | |
---|---|---|
Sensitivity (%) | Resistance (%) | |
Quinolones | ||
Ciprofloxacin (CPX) | 105 (72.92) | 39 (27.08) |
Ofloxacin (OFX) | 94 (65.28) | 50 (34.72) |
Pefloxacin (PEF) | 77 (53.47) | 67 (46.52) |
Nalidixic acid (NA) | 26 (18.06) | 118 (81.94) |
Norfloxacin (NB) | 29 (20.14) | 115 (79.86) |
Levofloxacin (LEV) | 126 (87.50) | 18 (12.50) |
β-lactam Antibiotics | ||
Ampicillin (PN) | 22 (15.28) | 122 (84.72) |
Cephalexinin (CEP) | 28 (19.44) | 116 (80.56) |
Amoxicillin (AMX) | 28 (19.44) | 116 (80.56) |
Augmentin (AU) | 51 (35.42) | 93 (64.58) |
Ampiclox (APX) | 41 (28.47) | 103 (71.53) |
Ceftazidime (CAZ) | 38 (26.39) | 106 (73.61) |
Cefotaxime (CTX) | 28 (19.44) | 116 (80.56) |
Ceftriazone (CRO) | 55 (38.19) | 89 (61.81) |
Meropenem (MEM) | 97 (67.36) | 47 (32.64) |
Ertapenem (ETP) | 65 (45.14) | 79 (54.86) |
Aztreonam (ATM) | 68 (47.22) | 76 (52.78) |
Aminoglycosides | ||
Gentamicin (CN) | 68 (47.22) | 76 (52.78) |
Streptomycin (S) | 79 (54.86) | 65 (45.14) |
Sulphonamide | ||
Cotrmoxazole (SXT) | 74 (51.39) | 70 (48.61) |
Rifampins | ||
Rifampicin (RD) | 86 (59.72) | 58 (40.28) |
Chloramphenicols | ||
Chloramphenicol (CH) | 70 (48.61) | 74 (51.39) |
Macrolides | ||
Erythromycin (E) | 73 (50.69) | 71 (49.31) |
Table 5: Distribution of Multidrug-resistant Proteus spp among patients attending selected hospitals in North-eastern Nigeria
Proteus species | Hospitals (%) | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSH Maiduguri | FMC Yola | SSH Damaturu | ATBUTH Bauchi |
FMC Gombe |
FMC Jalingo |
||
P.mirabilis | 23 (18.40) | 15(12.00) | 22 (17.6) | 15(12.00) | 23(18.40) | 18 (14.4) | 116(92.80) |
P. vulgaris | 2 (1.60) | 2 (1.60) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (1.60) | 1 (0.80) | 1 (0.80) | 8 (6.40) |
P. penneri | 1 (0.80) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.80) |
Total | 26 (20.60) | 17(13.60) | 22 (17.6) | 17(13.60) | 24 (19.2) | 19(15.20) | 125 (100) |
(X2=7.321, p= 0.695
This study showed that out of the 144 Proteus ssp isolated, 100 (69.44%) were β-lactamase enzymes producers, with only one isolate of P. penneri being the highest 1(100.0%), followed by P. mirabilis 91 (69.47%) and P. vulgaris having the least 8 (66.67%). A total of 95 (65.97%) of the isolates that are β-lactamase enzymes producers are simultaneously showing phenotypic MDR, with only one isolate of P. penneri being the highest 1(100.0%), followed by P. mirabilis 88 (67.18%) and P. vulgaris having the least 6(50.0%) (Figure 2).
(X2=0.207; df =2,
p-value = 0.901 )
Figure 2: Analysis of Extended spectrum beta lactamase production and Multidrug resistance among (A) Proteus mirabilis, (B) Proteus vulgaris, and (C) Proteus penneri identified from patients attending hospitals in Northeastern Nigeria
The distribution rate of β-Lactamase enzyme production among MDR Proteus spp. isolated from patients attending the selected Hospitals in the study area revealed that SSH, Maiduguri has the highest number of isolates, 24 (25.26%), followed by SSH, Damaturu, and FMC Jalingo with 17(17.89%) each and ATBU-TH, Bauchi the least with 8 (8.42%) (Table 6).
Table 6: Rate of Distribution of β-Lactamase Enzyme Production among MDR Proteus Spp. Isolated from Patients Attending the Selected Hospitals in the Study Area
Proteus species | Hospital | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSH Maiduguri | FMC Yola | SSH Damaturu |
ATBU-TH | FMC Gombe | FMC Jalingo |
||
P. mirabilis | 21(22.11) | 12(12.65) | 17(17.89) | 8(8.42) | 14(14.74) | 16(16.84) | 88(92.63) |
P. vulgaris | 2(2.11) | 2(2.11) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(1.05) | 1(1.05) | 6(6.32) |
P. penneri | 1(1.05) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(1.05) |
Total | 24(25.26) | 14(14.74) | 17 (17.89) | 8(8.42) | 15(15.79) | 17(17.89) | 95(100) |
(x2=6.40, df =10, p-value=0.781)
In this study, out of the one thousand five hundred (1500) clinical samples examined for Proteus spp, one hundred and forty-four (144) yielded positive bacterial growth, which translates into a prevalence rate of 9.60% (Table 1). This is similar to the findings of Feglo et al. (2010), with 8.4% from 2361 clinical specimens. Contrasting results were obtained by Abera and Biadglegne (2009), Yusha’u et al. (2010), and Senthamarai et al. (2015) with 37.3%, 17.05%, and 3.04% in studies conducted from Ethiopia, Nigeria, and India respectively. These variations in the prevalence might not be unconnected with a difference in the type of clinical samples, the sample size examined, and the handling and processing techniques. The sample size could affect the prevalence rate because the larger the sample size, the smaller the estimation error and as such, the true reflection of the characteristic in a population can be obtained when the sample size is larger. State Specialist Hospital (SSH) Maiduguri recorded the highest frequency of Proteus species 31 (2.07%), while the least was obtained from FMC Jalingo with 19 (1.27%). The distribution of Proteus spp. in various hospitals was statistically insignificant (p-value = 0.837). It was observed that overstretched facilities as a result of overcrowding and inadequate infection control practice were found to be a common problem affecting the selected hospitals in the study area (Table 1). Three (3) species of Proteus were identified in this study, with Proteus mirabilis (90.97%) being the most abundant. This is followed by Proteus vulgaris; the least was Proteus penneri (0.70%) (Table 2).
Gender-based distribution of the occurrence of Proteus showed that males were most affected 81 (56.25%) compared to females 63 (43.75%). This study revealed that the difference in gender in relation to the occurrence of Proteus spp. Infection was statistically not significant (p-value=0.728) (Table 3). This is in contrast to the reports of Feglo et al. (2010), who reported that 43.0% of Proteus species isolated from clinical samples were from male patients while 57.0% were from females. This ascendancy is most likely due to the fact that the degree of exposure of maless is higher as they represent the majority of the the labour force in Nigeria. This can expose an individual to various kinds of risks, such as injuries and interaction with contaminated objects, and since Proteus species are quite ubiquitous in nature, the rate of Proteus infection becomes very high. A similar observation was made by Bashwan and Shafey (2013) in Saudi Arabia, who reported an occurrence of 75% for males and 25% for females. The age group with the highest occurrence of Proteus spp was 31-40 years (20.83%), and the least was patients within the age category of 51-60years and >60years with 14 (9.72) and 13 (9.03%), respectively (Table 3). This concurred with the reports of Torpy et al. (2005) and Omole and Stephen (2014), that age significantly affects the prevalence of infections since adolescents and active ages adults are usually the ones involved in stressful activities such as searching for daily bread and farming (Hakim and Gress, 2007; Omole and Stephen, 2014), and with high tendency of socialization with peer group which may expose them more to infectious diseases.
A high level of antibiotic resistance of Proteus spp to all the Beta-lactam antibiotics used in this study was observed (96.64% ± 22.73). This implies that the mean resistance rate of Proteus spp towards ß-lactam antibiotics was 96.64%. This is quite high and very significant because eleven (11) ß-lactam antibiotics were tested. Meropenem was an exception, to which 67.36% of the isolates were susceptible. Individually, the highest resistance rate by the isolates was demonstrated against Ampicillin (84.72%), Amoxicillin, Cephalexin, and Cefotaxime, recorded at 80.56% each. Others with high resistance rates included Ceftazidime, Ceftriazone, and Ertapenem (73.61%, 61.81%, and 54.86%, respectively). Resistance of Proteus spp. to drug combinations was observed against Augmentin (64.58%) and Ampiclox (71.53%). The penicillin and cephalosporin resistance observed in this study can be explained by the excessive use of Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, and Ceftriazone for empirical therapy in hospitals. The production of ESBL as a resistance mechanism against these three antibiotics has been documented. Infection with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, where plasmid-carrying genes that encode ESBLs can be easily transmitted horizontally between different bacteria in the hospital environment (Schaufler et al., 2016; Vubil et al., 2017; Ghenea et al., 2022; Van-Almsick et al., 2022) Furthermore, antimicrobial susceptibility tests revealed that Levofloxacin (LEV) and Ciprofloxacin (CPX) antibiotic were the most effective antibiotics against Proteus spp. with a susceptibility rate of 126 (87.50%) and 105 (72.92%) respectively, followed by Ofloxacin (OFX) 94 (65.28%). The Proteus species isolated were found to have highly resistant to Nalidixic acid 118 (81.94%) and Norfloxacin 115 (79.86%), while moderately resistant against Gentamicin (CN) 76 (52.78%), Chloramphenical (CH) 74 (51.39%), Erythromycin (E) 71 (49.31%) and Cotrimoxazole (SXT) 70 (48.61%). In this study, members of the family Quinolones such as Levofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, and Ofloxacin proved to have high sensitivity rates as most efficacious against Proteus infections while Rifampicin and Streptomycin showed intermediate sensitivity pattern (Table 4).
The prevalence rate for the Proteus spp MDR strains in this study was 86.81%. The distribution of MDR strains of Proteus spp among the selected Hospitals shows that SSH, Maiduguri had the highest percentage of MDR strains (20.60%), followed by FMC, Gombe (19.2%), SSH, Damaturu (17.6%), FMC, Jalingo (15.20%) and ATBU-TH, Bauchi and FMC, Yola each recorded 13.60% (Table 5). The prevalence of confirmed ESBL-producing Proteus spp. based on Combined Disc Diffusion Test recorded in this study was 69.44% with P. mirabilis having 91 (69.47%) and P. vulgaris 8 (66.67%). The occurrence could be attributed to the acquisition of plasmids carrying ESBL genes leading to the emergence of 𝛽-lactamase producing Proteus strains (Bradford, 2001; Fam et al., 2011; Sah and Hemalatha, 2015) that can deactivate extended spectrum Cephalosporins, Penicillins, and Aztreonam. These enzymes might be coded on bacterial chromosomes or be plasmid-mediated, allowing their transfer between different bacterial populations. Up to 95 (65.97%) of the confirmed ESBL-producing Proteus spp. were phenotypically MDR strains. Multidrug-resistant strains with confirmed β-lactamases were higher among only one isolate of P. penneri (100%), followed by P. mirabilis (67.18%) and P. vulgaris (50.0%) (Table 6; Figure 2). Extended Spectrum β-lactamases producing organisms also have the potential capacity to acquire resistance to other antimicrobials such as Quinolones, Tetracyclines, Cotrimoxazole, Trimethoprim, and Aminoglycosides (Dhillon and Clark, 2011). The highest prevalence of confirmed MDR Proteus spp. producing β-lactamase enzymes was observed among isolates from SSH, Maiduguri at 25.26%, with P. mirabilis having 22.11%, P. vulgaris at 2.11%, and. P. penneri the least (1.05%). This is followed by SSH, Damaturu, and FMC, Jalingo 17.89%. The prevalence of a particularly resistant strain in a particular hospital is related to the frequency of antibiotic usage, and the predominance of a multi-resistant strain may be maintained by the widespread use of any one of the antibiotics to which it is resistant. This study shows higher levels of resistance due to ESBL production with resistance to Nalidixic acid, Norfloxacin, Gentamicin, Chloramphenicol, Cotrimoxazole, and Erythromycin. Hence, this cross-resistance astonishing features is worrisome because it restricts greatly the treatment options in patients infected with ESBL-producing Proteus spp.
In conclusion, this study revealed a notable prevalence of Proteus spp, at 9.60%. Proteus mirabilis emerged as the predominant species, constituting a significant majority of the isolates. Alarmingly, a substantial proportion displayed resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Multidrug resistance was prevalent in most of Proteus isolated, and Proteus mirabilis exhibited the highest frequency. Furthermore, a concerning majority of Proteus spp. demonstrated extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production, underscoring the urgent need to address this region's antimicrobial resistance. Regional epidemiological surveillance of ESBL-encoding genes is crucial, along with an investigation into the transmission mode within hospitals. Implementing effective antimicrobial stewardship is imperative to mitigate antibiotic resistance due to ESBL-producing Proteus in the region. Top of Form
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abera, B., & Biadeglegne, F. (2009). Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus spp. isolated from otitis media at Bahir Dar Regional Laboratory, North West Ethiopia. Ethiopian Medical Journal, 47(4), 271-276.
Akubuenyi, F. C., Arikpo, G. E., Ogugbue, C. J., Mfongeh, J. F. and Akpanumun, E. V. (2011). Antibiotic resistance profile of waste water isolates obtained from University of Calabar Teaching Hospital and General Hospital Calabar, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Microbiology, 25: 2243-2250.
Bahashwan, S. A., & El Shafey, H. M. (2013). Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Proteus Isolates from Clinical Specimens. European Scientific Journal, 9, 122-125.
Baker, F. J., Silverton, R. E. & Pallister, C. J. (2007). Baker and Silverton's Introduction to Medical Laboratory Technology. Publisher: Bounty Press Limited, Nigeria. Pg 285-311.
Bradford, P. A. (2001). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clinical microbiology reviews, 14(4), 933-951. [Crossref]
CDC, (2021). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antimicrobial resistance. Available online: cdc.gov (accessed on 12th December, 2023)
Cerceo, E., Deitelzweig, S.B., Sherman, B.M., & Amin, A.N. (2016). Multidrug-Resistant Gram Negative Bacterial Infections in the Hospital Setting: Overview, Implications for Clinical Practice, and Emerging Treatment Options. Microbial Drug Resistance, 22, 412-431. [Crossref]
Cheesbrough, B. (2006). District Laboratory practice in Tropical Countries Part 2, Second Edition Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pg. 132-143. [Crossref]
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2023).Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: Thirty-third informational supplement. National Committee for clinical laboratory standards document M100-Ed33, Wayne Pennslyvania, USA, 44-61
Davies, J. (1994). Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Science, 264, 375-382. [Crossref]
Dhillon, R. H. P., & Clark, J. (2011). ESBLs: A Clear and Present Danger? Critical Care Research and Practice, 2012, 11. [Crossref]
Ejikeugwu, C. (2023). Preparation of 0.5 Mcfarland Turbidity Standards. www.MicrobiologyClass.net
Falagas, M. E., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2009). Extended spectrum beta lactamase producing organisms. Journal of Hospital Infection. 73(4), 345-354. [Crossref]
Fam, N., Leflon-Guibout, V., Fouad, S., Aboul-Fadl, L., Marcon, E., & Desouky, D. (2011). CTX-M-15- producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Cairo (Egypt), including isolates of clonal complex ST10 and clones ST131, ST73, and ST405 in both community and hospital settings. Microbial Drug Resistance, 17, 6773. [Crossref]
Feglo, P. K., Stephen, Y. G., Solomon Nii, A. Q. & Clement, O. (2010). Occurrence of spp distribution and antibiotic resistance of Proteus isolates: A case study at the Komfo Anakye Teaching Hospital (KATH) Ghana. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 1(9), 347-352.
Ghenea, A. E., Zlatian, O. M., Cristea, O. M., Ungureanu, A., Mititelu, R. R., Balasoiu, A. T. et al. (2022). TEM, CTX-M, SHV Genes in ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Clinical Samples in a County Clinical Emergency Hospital Romania- Predominance of CTX-M-15. Antibiotics, 11, 503. [Crossref]
Hakim, F. T., & Gress, R. E. (2007). Immunosenescence: Deficits in adaptive immunity in the elderly. Tissue Antigens, 70(3), 179-189. [Crossref]
Jacoby, G. A., & Munoz-Price, L. S. (2005). The new betalactamases. The New England Journal of Medicine, 352(4), 380-391. [Crossref]
Lautenbach, E., Strom, B. L., Bilker, W. B., Patel, J. B., Edelstein, P. H. & Fishman, N. O. (2001). Epidemiological investigation of fluoroquinolone resistance in infections due to extended-spectrum β- lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clinical Infectious Disease, 33, 1288-1294. [Crossref]
Livermore, M. D. (2003). Bacterial resistance: Origins, epidemiology and impact. Clinical Infectious Disease. 36, 11-23. [Crossref]
Magiorakos, A. P., Srinivasan, A., Carey, R. B., Carmeli, Y., Falagas, M. E., Giske, C. G., Harbarth, S., Hindler, J. F., Kahlmeter, G., Olsson-Liljequist, B., Paterson, D. L., Rice, L. B., Stelling, J., Struelens, M. J., Vatopoulos, A., Weber, J. T., & Monnet, D. L. (2012). Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), 18(3), 268-281. [Crossref]
Medina, E., & Pieper, D. H. (2016). Tackling Threats and Future Problems of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 398, 3-33. [Crossref]
Mendelson, G., Hait, V., Ben-Israel, J., Gronich, D., Granot, E. & Raz, R. (2005). Prevalence and risk factors of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a long-term care facility. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 24, 17-22. [Crossref]
Oberoi, L., Nachhatarjit S., Poonam S. & Aruna A.(2013). ESBL, MBL and AmpC betalactamases Producing Superbugs-Havoc in the Intensive Care Units of Punjab India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7(1), 70-73. [Crossref]
Omole, A., & Stephen, E. (2014). Antibiogram Profile of Bacteria Isolated from Wound Infection of Patients in Three Hospitals in Anyigba, Kogi Sate, Nigeria. FUTA Journal of Research in Sciences, 2, 258-266.
Pacios O., Blasco L., Bleriot I., Fernandez-Garcia L., Bardanca M. G., Ambroa A., López M., Bou G. & Tomás M. (2020). Strategies to Combat Multidrug-Resistant and Persistent Infectious Diseases. Antibiotics, 9, 65. [Crossref]
Paterson, D. L., & Bonomo, R. A. (2005). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clinical Microbiology Review, 18(4):657-686. [Crossref]
Ribeiro da Cunha, B., Fonseca, L. P., & Calado, C. R. (2019). Antibiotic discovery: where have we come from, where do we go?. Antibiotics, 8(2), 45. [Crossref]
Sah, S. K. & Hemalatha, S. (2015). Extended spectrum Beta lactamase (ESBL) Mechanism of antibiotic resistance and Epidemiology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Technology Research, 7(2), 303-309
Schaufler, K., Semmler, T., Wieler, L. H., Wöhrmann, M., Baddam, R., Ahmed, N., Müller, K., Kola, A., Fruth, A., Ewers, C. et al. (2016). Clonal spread and interspecies transmission of clinically relevant ESBL producing Escherichia coli of ST410-Another successful pandemic clone. FEMS Microbiology and ecology, 92, 155. [Crossref]
Senthamarai, S., Sivasankari, S., Anitha C., Kumudavathi, M. S., Amshavathani S. K., Venugopal, V. & Thenmozhi Valli, P. R. (2015). A study of the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Proteus spp among various samples. International Journal of Advances in Pharmacy, Biology and Chemistry, 4(2), 355-360.
Stock, I. (2003). Natural antibiotic susceptibility of Proteus spp., with special reference to P. mirabilis and P. penneri strains. Journal of Chemotheraphy, 15:12-26. [Crossref]
Tenover, F. C. (2001). Development and spread of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents: An overview. Clinical and Infectious Disease, 33:108-115. [Crossref]
Tom, M. I., Agbo, E. B., Umar, A. F., Ibrahim. M. M., Askira, M. U., Jidda, B. U., Abdullahi, A., & Ali, B. H. (2018). Plasmid Profile Analysis of Multi-drug Resistant Proteus spp isolated from Patients with Wound Infection in Northeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Pathogen Research, 1(2): 1-9. [Crossref]
Torpy, J. M., Alison, B., & Richard, M. G. (2005). Surgical wound infections. JAMA Network, 294, 21-22. [Crossref]
Umar, J. B., Ibrahim, M. M., Tom, I. M., Umoru, A. M., & Isa, T. (2016). Pseudomonas aeruginosa in otitis media. International Journal of Medicine, 4(2), 55-57. [Crossref]
Van-Almsick, V., Schuler, F., Mellmann, A., & Schwierzeck, V. (2022). The use of long-read sequencing technologies in infection control: Horizontal transfer of a blaCTX-M-27 containing lncFII plasmid in a patient screening sample. Microorganisms, 10, 491. [Crossref]
Versalovic, J., Carroll, K., Jorgensen, J., Funke, G., Landry, M. & Warnock, D. (2011). Manual of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology ASM Press, Washington, USA. Pp. 450-575. [Crossref]
Vubil, D., Figueiredo, R., Reis, T., Canha, C., Boaventura, L., & DA Silva, G. J. (2017). Outbreak of KPC-3- producing ST15 and ST348 Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Portuguese hospital. Epidemiology and infection, 145(3), 595-599. [Crossref]
WHO, (2019). Worldwide Country Situation Analysis: Response to Antimicrobial Resistance; WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.
Yusha'u, M., Aliyu, H. M., Kumurya A. S., & Suleiman K. (2010). Prevalence of extended spectrum β- lactamases (ESBLS) among Enterobacteriaceae in Murtala Mohammed Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 169- 172. [Crossref]