UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research

E-ISSN: 2814 – 1822; P-ISSN: 2616 – 0668

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

The potential of Serratia marcescens in Bioremediation of Crude-oil Polluted Soil

Peekate, Lekiah Pedro*1 and Ogolo, Jessica Mark2

1,2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Rivers State University, P.M.B. 5080, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

*1Corresponding author E-mail: lekia.peekate@ust.ed.ng +2348063353116

2E-mail: markjessica414@gmail.com

Abstract

Bioremediation, which involves the use of microorganisms, is an environmentally friendly approach in restoring crude-oil polluted environments. The use of Serratia marcescens (SM) in bioremediation of crude-oil polluted soil was investigated in this study. Soil from a farm was inoculated in nutrient broth for bacterial enrichment. The broth culture was inoculated on nutrient agar and incubated at ambient temperatures (27 – 32 °C). Bacterial isolates with red colonies were selected and identified. Identified SM was used in preparing bacterial-mineral-salts suspension. The bioremediation experiment consisted of two setups: Control (CT) and setup treated with SM (TSM). Both setups contained crude-oil polluted soil. Mineral-salt solution and the bacterial-mineral-salt suspension were added to setup CT and TSM, respectively. Total hydrocarbon concentration (THC), total heterotrophic bacteria (THB), hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria (HUB), total fungi (TF), and hydrocarbon utilizing fungi (HUF) in the setups were determined at various times. About 38.3 % and 46.5 % THC reduction were achieved in setup CT and TSM, respectively. The percentage of THB that are HUB was higher in setup TSM on day 7 (8.8 %) and day 28 (4.4 %) but higher in setup CT on day 14 (1.7 %) and day 21 (6.6 %). The percentage of TF that are HUF was higher in setup TSM on day 14 (98.0 %) and on day 28 (41.6 %) but higher in setup CT on day 21 (85.3 %). It is concluded that SM has a potential for use in bioremediation of crude-oil polluted soil.

Keywords: Bioremediation, Crude-oil polluted soil, Hydrocarbon-degradation potential, Red colonies, Serratia marcescens

INTRODUCTION

Pollution of the terrestrial environment with crude oil and its products is an inevitable consequence of oil exploration, extraction, and transportation. Crude-oil-producing communities thus often experience devastating consequences of crude oil spills, which include economic loss due to loss of farmlands and wildlife, shortage of drinking water due to surface and groundwater contamination, and health issues resulting from inhalation of fumes and ingestion of contaminated water or food (Chukwuka et al., 2018; Ojimba, 2011; Ordinioha & Brisibe, 2013). Therefore, It is necessary to employ countermeasures to return polluted environments to their natural state. One of the promising countermeasures against crude oil pollution is bioremediation. Bioremediation involves using biodegradation agents, mainly bacteria and fungi, to break down or degrade pollutants (Bala et al., 2022). An advantage of bioremediation is that the biodegradation agents are fairly ubiquitous in natural environments. However, the hydrocarbon-degrading potential of a prospective bioremediation agent should be known before such an agent is deployed for full-scale bioremediation work. Also, the prospective biodegradation agent should have the ability to tolerate high concentrations of the pollutant, effectively/efficiently degrade the pollutant, be isolated and cultivated easily, grow relatively fast, and survive in a wide range of environmental stress (Hossain et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2022; Tahri et al., 2013).

Serratia marcescens have been implicated in some bioremediation studies as hydrocarbon degrading/utilizing microorganisms (Agbor & Antai, 2019; Akoachere et al., 2008; Bidja-Abena, 2020). It is commonly found in moist soil, water, and some plants (Gillen & Gibbs, 2012). Serratia marcescens is a rod-shaped Gram-negative motile bacterium known for its distinct red pigment called prodigiosin (Hejazi & Falkiner, 1997). This pigment makes the bacterium easily identifiable on nutrient agar plates. However, researchers have shown that the pigment is not produced at temperatures above 32 ° C (Haddix & Shanks, 2018; Romanowski et al., 2019). A wide range of carbon sources including glucose, maltose, starch, glycerol, and chitin (a polymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine), can be metabolized by Serratia marcescens (Bhargavi et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2019). This is due to Serratia marcescens being able to produce various enzymes. These enzymes include amylase, chitinase, lipase, and protease (Sharma & Tiwari, 2005), contributing to its ability to break down complex organic compounds. Serratia marcescens can adapt to harsh environmental conditions such as elevated salt concentrations and heavy metal contamination (Adedoyin et al., 2023; Ketola & Hiltunen, 2014). Some strains of Serratia marcescens are been explored for their potential in bio-pesticide production (Konecka et al., 2019; Fu et al., 2021; Tao et al., 2022). Due to its ability to metabolize various carbon sources and adapt to harsh environmental conditions, Serratia marcescens could be a prospective biodegradation agent. The aim of this study was thus to determine the potential of using Serratia marcescens in the bioremediation of crude oil-polluted soil.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection

A large quantity of soil of about 3 kg was collected from the demonstration farm () of the Rivers State University (RSU), Nigeria, located within the University's main campus, and transported to the Microbiology laboratory, RSU, for bacterial isolation and bioremediation experimentation.

Isolation of Serratia marcescens

A quantity (10 g) of the soil was placed in a conical flask containing 100 ml sterile nutrient broth, and the inoculated flask was incubated at ambient temperatures (27 – 32 °C) for 24 hours for microbial enrichment. After incubation, ten-fold serial dilution was carried out to a dilution of 10-5 using sterile normal saline. Aliquot of 0.1 ml of the different dilutions were then spread inoculated in duplicates on nutrient agar (NA) plates. Inoculated NA plates were incubated at ambient temperatures for 48 hours. After incubation, the plates were checked for the presence of red colonies. Such colonies were subcultured onto fresh NA plates and slants to obtain pure isolates and stock cultures. The isolates were subjected to Gram staining and microscopic examination and the following physicochemical and biochemical tests: catalase, oxidase, motility, citrate utilization, indole production, Methyl-Red, Vogues-Proskauer, salt tolerance (7 % NaCl tolerance), and fermentation tests using glucose, lactose, mannitol, sucrose, and xylose. These tests were carried out as described by Peekate (2022).

Preparation of Serratia marcescens isolates for Bioremediation Experiment.

A broth culture was prepared from a stock culture of identified Serratia marcescens. The broth culture was used to prepare plate cultures of Serratia marcescens; a sterile swab stick was dipped into the broth culture and used to inoculate the entire surface of sterile NA plates. Inoculation was done in quadruplicate. The inoculated plates were incubated at ambient temperatures (27 – 32 °C) for 24 hours. After incubation, the ensuing colonial growth was scooped using a sterile spatula and transferred into 200 ml sterile mineral salt solution (MSS). The composition (g/L) of the MSS was as follows: MgSO4.7H2O - 0.42, KH2PO4 - 0.83, NaCl - 10.0, KCl - 0.29, Na2HPO4 - 1.25, NaNO3 - 0.42 (Source: Odokuma & Dickson, 2003). The resulting bacterial-mineral-salt suspension was used in the bioremediation experiment.

Bioremediation Experiment and Monitoring

About 1 kg of soil was placed in 2 glass troughs and polluted with 200 ml crude oil. The artificially polluted soils were allowed undisturbed in the laboratory for 1 week. After this period, the total hydrocarbon concentration (THC) and populations of total heterotrophic bacteria (THB), hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria (HUB), total fungi (TF), and hydrocarbon-utilizing fungi (HUF) in the soils were determined. Then, about 100 ml of the bacterial-mineral-salts suspension earlier described was added to the polluted soil in one of the troughs, and the trough was labeled TSM; 100 ml sterile MSS was added to the polluted soil in the other trough, and the trough was labeled control (CT). The setups were maintained for 28 days at ambient temperatures (27 – 32 ºC); the relative humidity of the atmosphere during the 28 days was 58 – 61 %. The soil in the setups was tilled once every week, and the moisture content was maintained at 10-20 % using non-sterile MSS. The THC in the setups was determined at day 28, while THB, HUB, TF, and HUF populations were determined at weekly intervals for the 28-days.

Determination of THC

The THC in the soil samples was determined using the spectrophotometric method described by Peekate et al. (2023). In the method, a 5 g soil sample was placed in a 150 ml beaker, and 10 ml hexane was added. The mixture was stirred for about 30 seconds and then filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper held in a glass funnel into a 150 ml conical flask. The absorbance of the filtrate at 420 nm was then measured using a 721 VIS Spectrophotometer (Huanghua Faithful Instrument Co. Ltd, China). Absorbance reading was then used to determine THC through extrapolation from a previously obtained plots of concentrations of crude oil in hexane against absorbance at 420 nm.

Determination of Population of THB, HUB, TF, and HUF

The population of THB, HUB, TF, and HUF in the soil samples was determined by subjecting 1 g of the soil samples through a ten-fold serial dilution process to obtain 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, 10-4, and 10-5 dilutions. Sterile normal saline was used in the dilution process. Aliquots of 0.1 ml of the 10-3, 10-4, and 10-5 dilutions were spread inoculated in duplicates on nutrient agar (NA) plates; 0.1 ml of 10-2, 10-3, and 10-4 dilutions were spread inoculated in duplicates on mineral-salts agar (MSA) plates containing 100 mg/ml ketoconazole, MSA plates containing tetracycline (100 µg/ml), and potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates. Inoculated sets of MSA plates were supplied with petroleum hydrocarbons using the vapor phase transfer technique (Ebuehi et al., 2005). Inoculated NA plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 hours, while inoculated sets of MSA and PDA plates were incubated at ambient temperatures (27 – 32 °C) for 5 days. After incubation, ensuing colonies on NA plates, MSA plates containing ketoconazole, MSA plates containing tetracycline, and PDA plates were counted and used to calculate the THB, HUB, HUF, and TF populations.

Statistical Analysis

The total hydrocarbon concentrations obtained on day 28 in the control and treatment setups were analyzed for significant difference using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The confidence interval was set at 95 % (α = 0.05). ANOVA was calculated using a data analysis tool in Microsoft Excel® 2007.

RESULTS

Morphology, physicochemical, and biochemical characteristics of the bacteria isolates

Of the bacterial isolates with red colonies, three were randomly selected. The isolates were all motile Gram-negative rods; they were all positive to catalase, citrate utilization, Methyl-Red, Vogues-Proskauer, and salt tolerance tests; they were all negative to oxidase and indole production tests; they all produced acid and gas during glucose fermentation, but produced only acid during mannitol and sucrose fermentations; and they did not ferment lactose and xylose.

Hydrocarbon Concentration in the Setups

The total hydrocarbon concentration (THC) in the polluted soil before the treatments was 84182 ± 4866 mg/kg; by day 28, the THC in the experimental setups had reduced below the initial THC value (Table 1). About 38.3 % reduction in THCs was achieved in the control setup (CT), and a 46.5 % reduction in the setup (TSM) treated with Serratia marcescens. However, the THCs in both setups on day 28 were not significantly different (P ˃ 0.05).

Table 1: Hydrocarbon Concentrations in the Setups

thc (mg/kg) EHD
Day R1 R2 Mean ± SD (%)
1 PSbT 87 623 80 741 84 182 ± 4 866 -
28 CT 52 258 51 575 51 917 ± 483 38.3
TSM 47 856 42 239 45 048 ± 3 972 46.5

THC: Total hydrocarbon concentration, EHD: Extent of Hydrocarbon Degradation (EHD (%) = \(\frac{THC\ (day\ 1)\ - \ \ THC\ (day\ 28)\ }{THC\ (day\ 1)}\ \times 100\)), R: Replicate, SD: Standard deviation, PSbT: Polluted Soil before treatment, CT: control setup, TSM: Setup treated with Serratia marcescens

Population of THB and HUB in the Setups

The populations of total heterotrophic bacteria (THB) and hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria (HUB) in the polluted soil before the treatments were 2.5±0.3 × 106 CFU/g and 4.3±1.4 × 104 CFU/g, respectively. During the experiment, from day 7 to 28, the population of THB in CT ranged from 1.9±1.1 × 107 to 6.1±2.7 × 107 CFU/g, while the population of HUB ranged from 2.1±1.3 × 105 to 4.0±2.9 × 106 CFU/g. In setup TSM, the population of THB ranged from 2.6±1.9 × 106 to 7.1±4.0 × 107 CFU/g, while the population of HUB ranged from 2.3±1.7 × 105 to 1.7±1.0 × 106 CFU/g. In comparison, the mean THB population in setup CT was higher than the mean THB population in setup TSM on day 7, slightly higher on days 14 and 28, but the same on day 21, as shown in Figure 1. However, ANOVA of THB populations in both setups on days 7, 14, and 28 showed that the THB populations were not significantly different (P ˃ 0.05). On the other hand, the mean HUB population in setup CT was slightly higher than the mean HUB population in setup TSM from day 14 to 28. Statistical analysis of HUB populations in both setups on days 14, 21, and 28 showed that the HUB populations were significantly different (P ˂ 0.05) on day 14 but were not significantly different (P ˃ 0.05) on days 21 and 28. The percentage of THB that are HUB was higher in setup TSM on day 7 (8.8 %) and day 28 (4.4 %), as shown in Figure 2. Though the percentage of THB that are HUB was higher in setup CT on day 14 (1.7 %) and on day 21 (6.6 %), it was not as high as that observed in setup TSM on days 7 and 28.

Figure 1: Total heterotrophic and hydrocarbon utilizing bacterial populations in the setups.

Figure 2: Percentage of hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria in the setups.

Population of TF and HUF in the Setups

The population of total fungi (TF) and hydrocarbon-utilizing fungi (HUF) in the polluted soil before the experiment was 4.0±3.7 × 105 CFU/g and 2.5±0.3 × 105 CFU/g, respectively. During the experiment, from day 7 to 28, the population of TF in CT ranged from 1.3±0.1 × 106 to 7.3±1.0 × 106 CFU/g, while the population of HUF ranged from 3.1±2.4 × 105 to 5.2±1.6 × 106 CFU/g. In setup TSM, the population of TF ranged from 6.1±5.5 × 105 to 1.4±0.4 × 107 CFU/g, while the population of HUF ranged from 1.6±0.8 × 105 to 2.9±1.8 × 106 CFU/g. There were no clear-cut differences in the populations of TF and HUF in both setups for the duration of the experiment, as shown in Figure 3; Populations of TF and HUF appeared to occupy a band between 5.2 to 7.2 Log10 CFU/g. However, TF populations in setup CT stood out as the highest on day 7, TF populations in setup TSM stood out as the highest on day 21, and HUF population in setup CT stood out as the least on day 28. Statistical analysis of the fungal populations in both setups on days 7, 21, and 28 showed that the fungal populations were not significantly different (P ˃ 0.05). The percentage of TF that are HUF was higher in setup TSM on day 14 (98.0 %) and on day 28 (41.6 %), as shown in Figure 4; on day 21, it was higher (85.3 %) in setup CT.

Figure 3: Total and hydrocarbon utilizing fungal populations in the setups.

Figure 4: Percentage of hydrocarbon utilizing fungi in the setups.

DISCUSSION

The addition of microorganisms during the remediation of crude oil-polluted environments can enhance the rate of degradation of the hydrocarbon pollutants. Such microorganisms should be hydrocarbon degraders able to withstand the stress brought about by the toxic nature of hydrocarbons and variations in environmental conditions. Serratia marcescens can adapt to harsh environmental conditions (Adedoyin et al., 2023; Ketola & Hiltunen, 2014) and has been implicated as a hydrocarbon-degrading microorganism (Agbor & Antai, 2019). Serratia marcescens can be identified on nutrient agar plates as red colonies due to its red pigment, which it produces at temperatures below 32 ° C. In this study, the red colonies on nutrient agar plate cultures incubated at ambient temperatures (27 – 32 °C) were shown to possess similar physicochemical and biochemical characteristics as attributed to Serratia marcescens in other related works (Agbodjato et al., 2015; Othman et al., 2019; Patel et al., 2016). Also, the use of “Advanced Bacterial Identification Software” (https://www.tgw1916.net/bacteria_Enterobacterales_input.php) revealed the identity of the bacterial isolates with red colonies as Serratia marcescens with 87.5 % similarity.

The extent of hydrocarbon degradation in crude-oil polluted soil treated with S. marcescens and nutrients in mineral salts after 28 days was 46.5 %. In the control, with nutrients but not the bacterium, the extent of hydrocarbon degradation was 38.3 %. The degradation as a result of the addition of the bacterium was not significantly different (P ˃ 0.05) from that achieved in the control setup. This indicates that the nutrients added to both setups played a major role in enhancing hydrocarbon biodegradation. Also, the fairly narrow gap in the extent of hydrocarbon degradation between the control and treatment could result from the bacterium not previously exposed to hydrocarbons. In some related works (Bidja-Abena et al., 2020; Obiajulu et al., 2022; Olajide & Adeloye, 2023), the addition of S. marcescens to hydrocarbon polluted medium resulted in a higher extent of hydrocarbon degradation. In Olajide & Adeloye (2023), hydrocarbon degradation of 54.7 – 86.9 % was achieved after 7 days of shaker incubation of different setups of water contaminated with separate fractions of crude-oil at 1 % (v/v) concentration inoculated with S. marcescens; in Obiajulu et al (2022), 78.7 – 79.3 % was achieved after 14 days of incubation with intermittent shaking of a mineral-salts solution contaminated with crude-oil at 1 % (v/v) concentration. In Bidja-Abena et al. (2020), the addition of S. marcescens to a mineral-salts solution contaminated with crude oil at about 0.4 % (w/v) concentration resulted in 65.5 % hydrocarbon degradation after 20 days of shaker incubation. The higher extent of hydrocarbon degradation obtained in the aforementioned related works could be attributed to their use of single bacterium, strains of S. marcescens from hydrocarbon-polluted environments, lower pollutant concentration (0.4 and 1 %), fractions of crude oil, and aqueous solutions or water as the polluted medium. Water and aqueous solutions are homogenous mediums, and under a shaker, incubation allows for even distribution of microorganisms, nutrients, and aeration; this could not be achievable in soil, a heterogeneous medium. Serratia marcescens used in this study were isolated from unpolluted soil and may not have fully developed hydrocarbon degrading capabilities as those resident in hydrocarbon-polluted environments for a long time.

Furthermore the bacterium was added into polluted soil, having an adequate population of other microorganisms. Some antagonism can occur in the resulting cultures, limiting hydrocarbon degrading activity. On the other hand, the estimated pollutant (crude oil) concentration used in this study is calculated to be about 20 % (v/w). This is much greater than the 0.4 and 1 % used in the other studies.

The total heterotrophic bacterial population (THBP) was greater than the hydrocarbon-utilizing bacterial population (HUBP) in both setups during the experiment. This has been observed in some bioremediation setups in some studies (Chikere et al., 2012; Odokuma & Dickson, 2003; Peekate et al., 2018) and indicates that probably not all bacteria in hydrocarbon-polluted soils are hydrocarbon degraders. It may also indicate the likely presence of organic substrates other than hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon-polluted soils. On the other hand, there was a lag phase in THBP from day 1 to 7 in the setup treated with Serratia marcescens. This could indicate a period of adaptation of the indigenous bacteria to the presence of the introduced bacteria (S. marcescens). The percent HUBP was, for the most part, higher in the setup treated with S. marcescens (setup TSM) than in the control setup. This indicates a a higher level of hydrocarbon bio-utilization in the setup TSM compared to the control setup. The higher level of bio-utilization supports the higher extent of hydrocarbon degradation observed in setup TSM. As with HUBP, the percent HUFP was, for the most part, higher in the setup treated with S. marcescens than in the control setup. This reinforces the suggestion that there was a higher hydrocarbon bio-utilization in the setup TSM compared to the control setup. There was not much difference in the total fungal population (TFP) and the hydrocarbon-utilizing fungal population (HUFP) in both setups during the experiment. This could indicate that all fungi in hydrocarbon-polluted soils are hydrocarbon degraders.

Serratia marcescens has been considered an opportunistic pathogen (Khanna et al., 2013; Murdoch et al., 2011). However, it is not responsible for a particular infection in humans, animals, or plants. Being opportunistic, it will only cause infection in immunocompromised persons. Serratia marcescens may thus be a potential candidate for bioremediation of polluted environments.

CONCLUSION

Serratia marcescens, a bacterium implicated as a hydrocarbon degrader, can easily be identified on nutrient agar medium due to its red pigment, which it produces at temperatures below 32 ° C. The use of S. marcescens in enhancing hydrocarbon degradation in crude-oil-polluted soil in this study resulted in 46.5 % hydrocarbon degradation, though not significantly different from the 38.3 % degradation obtained in control. There is, therefore, a potential for using S. marcescens exposed to hydrocarbon pollutants in the bioremediation of crude-oil polluted soil.

Funding:

This study received no financial support from any Institution or Organization.

Competing Interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions:

The lead author conceptualized and designed the study, and the co-author carried out the laboratory aspects of the study under the guidance of the lead author. Both authors contributed equally in writing and proofreading the manuscript.

References

Adedoyin, F. T., Sridhar, B. B. M., & Rosenzweig, J. A. (2023). Impact of metal exposure on environmentally isolated Serratia marcescens’ growth, oxidative-stress resistance, biofilm formation, and proliferation in eukaryotic co-culture models. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 253, 114677.

Agbor, R. B., & Antai, S. P. (2019). Phylogenetic Relationship of bacterial species involved in bioremediation of hydrocarbon polluted soils. Annual Research & Review in Biology32 (6), 1-13.

Agbodjato, N. A., Noumayo, P. A., Baba-Moussa, F., Salami, H. A., Sina, H., Sezan, A., Bankole, H., Adjanohoun, A., & Baba-Moussa, L. (2015). Characterization of potential plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from Maize (Zea mays L.) in Central and Northern Benin (West Africa). Applied and Environmental Soil Science, Article ID 901656, 9 pages.

Akoachere , J-F. T. K., Akenji, T. N., Yongabi, F. N., Nkwelang, G., & Ndip, R. N. (2008). Lubricating oil-degrading bacteria in soils from filling stations and auto- mechanic workshops in Buea, Cameroon: occurrence and characteristics of isolates. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7 (11), 1700-1706.

Bala, S., Garg, D., Thirumalesh, B. V., Sharma, M., Sridhar, K., Inbaraj, B. S., & Tripathi, M. (2022). Recent Strategies for Bioremediation of Emerging Pollutants: A Review for a Green and Sustainable Environment. Toxics10 (8): 484.

Bhargavi, P. L., Kumar, B. S., & Prakasham, R. S. (2012). Impact of Nutritional factors verses Biomass and Serralysin Production in isolated Serratia marcescens. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy, 6 (4), 449-457.

Bidja-Abena, M. T., Chen, G., Chen, Z., Zheng, X., Li, S., Li, T., & Zhong, W. (2020). Microbial diversity changes and enrichment of potential petroleum hydrocarbon degraders in crude oil-, diesel-, and gasoline-contaminated soil. 3 Biotech10 (2): 42-57.

Chikere, C. B., Chikere, B. O., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2012). Bioreactor-based bioremediation of hydrocarbon-polluted Niger Delta marine sediment, Nigeria. 3 Biotech2 (1): 53-66.

Chukwuka, K. S., Alimba, C. G., Ataguba, G. A., Jimoh, W. A. (2018). The Impacts of Petroleum Production on Terrestrial Fauna and Flora in the Oil-Producing Region of Nigeria. In P. E. Ndimele (Ed.), The Political Ecology of Oil and Gas Activities in the Nigerian Aquatic Ecosystem (pp. 125-142). Academic Press.

Ebuehi, O. A. T., Abibo, I. B., Shekwolo, P. D., Sigismund, K. I., Adoki, A., & Okoro, I. C. (2005). Remediation of crude oil contaminated soil by enhanced natural attenuation technique. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 9 (1), 103-106.

Fu, R., Luo, J., Feng, K., Lu, X., & Tang, F. (2021). Termite-killing components in Serratia marcescens (SM1). Journal of Forestry Research, 32, 1739–1744.

Gillen, A. L. & Gibbs, R. (2012). Serratia marcescens: The Miracle Bacillus. Faculty Publications and Presentations, 138.

Haddix, P. L., & Shanks, R. M. Q. (2018). Prodigiosin pigment of Serratia marcescens is associated with increased biomass production. Archives of microbiology200(7), 989–999.

Hejazi, A., & Falkiner, F. R. (1997). Serratia marcescensJournal of Medical Microbiology, 46 (11), 903-912. 

Hossain, F., Akter, A., Sohan, S. R., Sultana, N., Reza, A., Hoque, K. F. (2022). Bioremediation potential of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria: isolation, characterization, and assessment. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 29 (1), 211-216.

Huang, J., Ai, G., Liu, N., & Huang, Y. (2022). Environmental adaptability and organic pollutant degradation capacity of a novel Rhodococcus species derived from soil in the uninhabited area of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Microorganisms, 10 (10): 1935.

Ketola, T., & Hiltunen, T. (2014). Rapid evolutionary adaptation to elevated salt concentrations in pathogenic freshwater bacteria Serratia marcescensEcology and Evolution4(20), 3901-3908. 

Khanna, A., Khanna, M., & Aggarwal, A. (2013). Serratia marcescens - a rare opportunistic nosocomial pathogen and measures to limit its spread in hospitalized patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research7(2), 243–246.

Konecka, E., Mokracka, J., Krzymińska, S., & Kaznowski, A. (2019). Evaluation of the pathogenic potential of insecticidal Serratia marcescens strains to humans. Polish Journal of Microbiology68 (2), 185–191.

Murdoch, S. L., Trunk, K., English, G., Fritsch, M. J., Pourkarimi, E., & Coulthurst, S. J. (2011). The opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens utilizes type VI secretion to target bacterial competitors. Journal of Bacteriology, 193 (21), 6057-6069.

Obiajulu, N. O.., Chukwuma, O. J., & Chukwudi, A. (2022). Crude oil hydrocarbon degradation efficiency of indigenous bacterial strains isolated from contaminated sites in Nigeria. Journal of Biological Research & Biotechnology, 20 (2), 1606-1609.

Odokuma, L. O., & Dickson, A. A. (2003). Bioremediation of a crude oil polluted tropical mangrove environment. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 7 (2), 23-29.

Ojimba, T. P. (2011). Economic effects of crude oil spillages on crop farms in Rivers State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 17 (2), 131-136.

Olajide, P. O., & Adeloye, A. O. (2023). Hydrocarbon biodegradation by Proteus and Serratia strains isolated from oil-polluted water in Bonny Community, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Results in Chemistry, 5: 100735.

Ordinioha, B., & Brisibe, S. (2013). The human health implications of crude oil spills in the Niger delta, Nigeria: An interpretation of published studies. Nigerian Medical Journal54(1), 10-16.

Othman, M. A., El-Zamik, F. I., Hegazy, M. I., & Salama, A. S. A. (2019). Isolation and identification of Egyptian strains of Serratia marcescens producing antibacterial and antioxidant prodigiosin pigment. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 46 (5),1573-1582.

Patel, K., Patel, S., Parekh, V., & Jha, S. (2016). Isolation and characterization of salt tolerant phosphate solubilizing Serratia marcescens isolated from coastal area. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 10 (3), 2401-2408.

Peekate, L. P. (2022). Deciphering the identity of bacterial isolates through conventional means: A practical guide. Edese Printing & Publishing Company, Port Harcourt, Nigeria, pp. 21-48.

Peekate, L. P., Abu, G. O., & Ogugbue, C. J. (2018). Investigating the effectiveness between using Pseudomonas fluorescens and its biosurfactant in bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Bioresource Technology, 3 (2), 1-10.

Peekate, L. P., Obediah, A. I., & Onunwo, M. (2023). Use of wastewater from legume cooking in bioremediation of crude-oil polluted soil. IIARD Journal of Biology and Genetic Research, 9 (1), 37-53.

Romanowski, E. G., Lehner, K. M., Martin, N. C., Patel, K. R., Callaghan, J. D., Stella, N. A., & Shanks, R. M. Q. (2019). Thermoregulation of prodigiosin biosynthesis by Serratia marcescens is controlled at the transcriptional level and requires HexS. Polish journal of microbiology68(1), 43–50.

Sharma, A., & Tiwari, R. (2005). Extracellular enzyme production by environmental strains of Serratia spp. isolated from river Narmada. Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics, 42, 178-181.

Tahri, N., Bahafid, W., Sayel, H., & El-Ghachtouli, N. (2013). Biodegradation: Involved Microorganisms and Genetically Engineered Microorganisms. InTech.

Tao, A., Wang, T., Pang, F., Zheng, X., Ayra-Pardo, C., Huang, S., Xu, R., Liu, F., Li, J., Wei, Y., Wang, Z., Niu, Q., & Li, D. (2022). Characterization of a novel chitinolytic Serratia marcescens strain TC-1 with broad insecticidal spectrum. AMB Express, 12: 100.

Yan, Q., Robert, S., Brooks, J. P. Fong, & S. S. (2019). Metabolic characterization of the chitinolytic bacterium Serratia marcescens using a genome-scale metabolic model. BMC Bioinformatics 20: 227.