E-ISSN: 2814 – 1822; P-ISSN: 2616 – 0668
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
1,4Temilade Ozabor,1Deborah Falomo, 1Elizabeth Taiwo, 1Oyindamola Alabi, 1Precious Adediran, 2,3Femi Ayoade, 4Ilesanmi Fadahunsi and 1Janet Olaitan
1Department of Microbiology, Osun State University, Osogbo
2Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
3African Centre of Excellence for the Genomics of Infectious Diseases (ACEGID), Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
4Food Microbiology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Microbiology, University of Ibadan
This study was designed to investigate the antagonistic pattern of Bacillus species against MDR bacterial food-borne pathogens and aflatoxigenic fungi and evaluate their technological properties. Morphological and biochemical characterizations were done using standard methods. Production of cell-free metabolites, agar well diffusion, optimization of Bacillus growth rates, and enzymatic assays were also carried out using standard techniques, while aflatoxin quantification and qualification were done using high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HP-TLC). Results revealed that B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia had the highest inhibitory activity against S. enteritidis ATCC 13875 (27mm), while B. paralicheniformis had the least inhibitory activity against A. niger (7mm). B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia also had the highest growth rate at 30oC, followed by B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia and B. paralicheniformis OKAO4.12ia. However, there was no significant difference in the growth rates of B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia at 30oC and 40oC (p < 0.05). Furthermore, B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia and B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia had the highest growth rate at pH 8, while a lower growth rate was observed at pH6 (p < 0.05) in all five Bacillus sp. In addition, B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia and B. subtilis IPOI5.10ia had the highest growth rates using glucose and galactose as carbon sources, respectively. Growth in nitrogen sources showed that B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia had the highest growth rate, while B. subtilis IPOI5.10ia and B. subtilis OGOA10.7ii growths were not significantly different at p < 0.05. More so, B. subtilis IPOI3.12i had the least growth in peptone. In addition, B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia also produced the highest amounts of protease, amylase, and lipase enzymes, while B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia produced the least. Therefore, from the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia can be employed as a potential starter culture for producing microbiologically safe foods.
Keywords: Enzymes, spectrophotometer, antimicrobial metabolites, agar well diffusion, high-performance thin-layer chromatography
The literature has documented Bacillus species as a spore-forming Gram-positive, rod-shaped, aerobic organism with diverse inherent antimicrobial peptides such as antibiotics and bacteriocins (Riffat et al., 2020). Due to their endospore formation, Bacillus can be found in several places, such as aquatic environments, foods, soil, rocks, and gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals. Literature has also reported that they can be found in extreme environments such as those found in high pH (B. alcalophilus), high temperature (B. thermophilus), and high salt concentration (B. halodurans) (War and Joshi, 2014; Jooste et al., 2019). The antimicrobial peptides produced are either ribosomally or non-ribosomally synthesized. Examples include fengycin, iturin, and surfactin. These AMPs have been widely reported to be used for various beneficial purposes in the food, pharmaceutical, medical, biotechnological, and agriculture-based industries (Beladjal et al., 2018; Caulier et al., 2019).
According to the reports of Christie and Setlow (2020), Bacillus can produce numerous enzymes and metabolites that can be harnessed into useful products in various industries (Eijlander et al. 2011). Food spoilage and pathogenic bacteria have been documented to be threats to food quality and safety. Pathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli Clostridium botulinum, and Listeria monocytogenes have been reported to cause inflammatory, respiratory, systemic and intestinal infections when ingested with food (Todorov et al., 2015; Suganthi et al., 2015). As the use of chemical preservatives has been reported to be highly detrimental to animal and human health, the focus has been shifted to the use of safe microbial metabolites/peptides with functional properties that can be used for the production and preservation of foods (Ramesh et al., 2014; Yost et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2016).
Literatures have documented some members of the Bacillus species to be recognized as GRAS (generally regarded as safe) such as: B. subtilis, B. licheniformis and B. polymyxa due to their safe use in the food and pharmaceutical industries based to their safety assessment records, short fermentation time, high growth rates, high secretion of antimicrobial peptides into the fermenting medium and usage as supplements in human foods and animal feeds (Benitez et al., 2010; Abriouel et al., 2011; Cutting, 2011; Chopra et al., 2015 and Eishaghabee, 2017). In addition, other non-food grade species have also been well documented to be used in agriculture, such as B. thuringiensis and B. siamensis, which are known to produce secondary inhibitory metabolites used for the production of insecticides and destruction of fungal plant pathogens such as Rhizoctonia solani and Botrytis cinerea respectively (Slonczewski and Foster, 2011; Jeong et al., 2012). According to the reports of Ryan and Ray (2014), many Bacillus species produce industrially important enzymes such as barnase, amylase, protease, and BamH1 restriction enzymes. Thioldisulphide oxidoreductase in B. subtilis is key for the secretion of disulfide-bond-containing proteins (Schallney et al., 2014).
Antimicrobial metabolites such as bacteriocins and bacteriocin-like substances are peptides secreted by microorganisms, including the Bacillus species, to act as self-defense (Abriouel et al., 2011; Hashemizadeh et al., 2011). Due to the high demand for minimally processed foods with very little or no chemical preservatives, the search for natural antimicrobials is increasing (Cotter et al., 2013). GRAS Bacillus metabolites are generally safe and stable with therapeutic potentials as antimicrobials (Kaskoniene et al., 2017; Noda et al., 2018). In recent times, attention has also been drawn to the ability of Bacillus metabolites to inhibit the growth of multi-drug antibiotic-resistant organisms such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pneumoniae (PRSP), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli 0157: H7. (Sivaranjani et al., 2019; Du et al., 2020; Simon et al., 2020 and Huang et al., 2021). Furthermore, the inhibitory capacity of Bacillus metabolites against cancerous cells has also been documented (Kaur et al., 2015; Javed et al., 2020). Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the antagonistic effects of food-grade Bacillus species against typed multi-drug resistant food-borne bacterial pathogens and aflatoxin-producing fungi as well as evaluate their technological potentials of enzyme production to use them as potential starter cultures during fermentation processes for the production of microbiologically safe foods.
Bacillus cultures previously isolated from traditionally fermented condiments, namely Parkia biglobosa, Ricinus communis, Pentaclethra macrophylla, and Prosopis africana, were obtained from the culture collection center of the Department of Microbiology, University of Ibadan, and resuscitated to confirm their potency. The isolates were resuscitated by streaking on nutrient agar (Liofilchem, Italy) and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Each isolate was reinoculated into trypticase soya broth (TSB) and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The pure cultures were obtained by repeated streaking on trypticase soya agar (TSA) and stocked on TSA slants at 4°C. Moreso, typed MDR food-borne pathogens were obtained from the culture collection centres of the Nigeria Institute of Medical Research (NIMR), Yaba, Lagos State and Redemers University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria.
Pure Bacillus cultures (18-24 hr. old) were subjected to morphological, biochemical, and sugar fermentation tests such as Gram staining, motility, endospore staining, catalase, oxidase, citrate utilization, lysine, gas and hydrogen sulfide production, indole, starch hydrolysis, haemolysis, and carbohydrate utilization as recommended in the Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology 9th edition (Olaitan et al., 2022).
Bacteria isolates were inoculated into 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks (SSG, UK) containing 200 ml of tryptic soya broth with 1% yeast extract and incubated at room temperature for 48 hr. with intermittent shaking. The broth cultures were filtered to separate the cells. The filtrate was filtered through a 0.22 μm size membrane (Millipore, India), and the crude extracts were stored at 4°C (Fadahunsi et al., 2021).
One gram of sample was homogenized in 10 ml of sterile distilled water and serially diluted. One (1) ml of 103 and 107 dilution factors were inoculated into sterile potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and incubated at 30 ± 2∘C for 5-7 days. The fungi were characterized using the fungi compendium (Alexopoulus). Distinct colonies were identified based on the colony appearance, texture, color, reverse side color, and growth rate (Jonathan et al., 2016).
The presence of aflatoxins in the groundnut samples was quantified at the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, using HPTLC (Rheotype Gilson Abimed Model 231). one hundred (100) g of groundnut sample was defatted with N-hexene Soxhlet extractor, and the defatted residue extracted with ethyl acetate (three times, 60 mL/each). The extracts were combined and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered. The filtrate was transferred into a glass vial and evaporated under nitrogen steam. The crude extracts were then suspended into 1mL chloroform and placed in a 14 × 0.8 cm column containing 2.5 Kiesel gel 60 and 70/230 silica gel. Aflatoxin quantification for AF B1 and B2; G1 and G2 were done using the Lichrosorb RP-18 column. The result was compared with a standard aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, and G2 curve (Jonathan et al., 2016).
The following typed multi-drug bacterial cultures collected from the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) were used as pathogenic indicator organisms: Escherichia coli DCM 10974, Escherichia coli ATCC 43816, Salmonella enteritidis ATCC 13875, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus GP054 and Pseudomonas stutzeri GN029 while two untyped aflatoxin producing fungal cultures isolated from groundnut samples namely: Aspergillus flavus GB and Aspergillus niger AGM were also used. Gentamycin (30μg) was used as a control. All indicator organisms were reconfirmed by subjecting them to biochemical and sugar fermentation tests using Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology 9th edition (Olaitan et al., 2022). The fungal isolates were grown on sterile potato dextrose agar (PDA) incubated at 35 °C for 3-5 days. Their growths were characterized using the fungi compendium. The aflatoxins in the groundnut samples were quantified using the high-performance thin layer (HPTLC) technique (Jonathan et al., 2016).
Sterile molten Mueller Hinton agar (20 ml) was dispensed into Petri plates and seeded with 0.2 ml broth culture of 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards (1.5×108 cfu/ml). The plates were swirled gently to allow even distribution, and a sterile cork borer was used to make wells of 8mm diameter on the Petri plates. One hundred (100) μl of Bacillus crude metabolites was aseptically dispensed into the wells and left on the laboratory bench for 2 hours to allow diffusion. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Zones of inhibition (mm) were measured and recorded (Jadhav et al., 2010; Fadahunsi et al., 2021). Isolates with the highest inhibition zones were selected for the optimization process and enzyme assay.
A loopful of twenty-four (24) hr. colonies of each Bacillus isolate was inoculated into 10ml of nutrient broth and incubated at 30°C for 24 hr to observe growth by turbidity. This was measured using a Shimadzu UV-VIS spectrophotometer (model no: 1780). The isolates that grew at 30°C were further subjected to growth at 40°C and 50°C (Panda and Sahu, 2013).
An aliquot of 0.5 ml of each crude Bacillus cell-free supernatant was inoculated into 5 ml nutrient broth at pH 6 and 8, respectively. 0.1 ml of each isolate was collected at T0=0h and after incubation for 4hrs (T1), at 37°C. (Unban et al., 2020). The test tubes were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards (1.5×108 cfu/ml ) and read using a UV-spectrophotometer (Cary 300 Bio; 00-100784) at 600nm.
To determine the effect of carbon sources on the growth of Bacillus sp. metabolites, 1g of glucose, fructose, and galactose was added into 10 ml tryptic soy broth (TSB), while 1.0g of peptone and tryptone were added into 10ml TSB for the nitrogen sources. Each test tube was inoculated with a loopful of supernatant and incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hr (Abo-Amer, 2011). The test tubes were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards (1.5×108 cfu/ml ) and read using a UV-spectrophotometer (Cary 300 Bio; 00-100784) at 600nm.
Production of protease: The spot method was used to determine protease production by the selected Bacillus species. Nutrient agar was supplemented with 10% (v/v) skimmed milk and autoclaved at 121oC for 15 minutes. The Bacillus cultures were spotted on the sterile medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. The appearance of transparent halos around the spots indicates the presence of protease enzyme (Chantawannakul et al., 2002)
Nutrient agar was supplemented with 2% (w/v) potato starch and autoclaved at 121oC for 15 minutes. The Bacillus cultures were spotted on the sterile medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. After incubation, the Petri plates were sprayed with Lugol’s iodine and kept on the laboratory bench for 15 minutes. Clear halos around the spotted area indicate the presence of amylase (Savadogo et al., 2011).
Nutrient agar was supplemented with 3% (v/v) Cocos nucifera (coconut) oil and autoclaved at 121oC for 15 minutes. The Bacillus cultures were spotted on the sterile medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. Clear halos around the spotted area indicate the presence of lipase (Dahiya et al., 2011).
Values are presented as means ± standard error of duplicate values.
The phenotypic characterization of Bacillus species is summarized in Table 1. The shape, size, consistency, color, opacity, elevation, surface, and edge of the resuscitated isolates ranged from irregular, circular, filamentous; 0.2-.0.5 mm; friable, viscoid, butyrous; white, cream; opaque, translucent; flat, raised, convex; rough, dull, smooth; lobate, entire, rhizoid and fimbriate respectively.
In Table 2 below, the biochemical and sugar fermentation tests are documented. All the Bacillus isolates were Gram-positive rods, catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. The hemolysis test on blood agar showed alpha and beta hemolysis only. About 98% of all the Bacillus were able to ferment glucose, lactose, fructose, maltose, and D-mannose with gas production.
Table 1: Phenotypic characterization of Bacillus species
S/N | Isolates Code | Shape | Size (mm) | Consistency | Color | Opacity | Elevation | Surface | Edge |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OO14.7iib | irregular | 0.4 | friable | white | opaque | flat | rough | lobate |
2 | OKO17.12ia | Circular | 0.2 | viscoid | white | opaque | flat | dull | fimbriate |
3 | IPOI3.12ia | Circular | 0.3 | friable | cream | opaque | flat | smooth | entire |
4 | OO13.10i | irregular | 0.3 | butyrous | cream | opaque | flat | smooth | Lobate |
5 | OOI1.7i | irregular | 0.3 | friable | white | opaque | convex | rough | fimbriate |
6 | OGOA10.7iia | irregular | 0.4 | friable | cream | translucent | raised | dull | fimbriate |
7 | IPOI3.12ia | filamentous | 0.4 | viscoid | white | opaque | convex | rough | Rhizoid |
8 | OO13.10i | filamentous | 0.4 | viscoid | white | opaque | convex | rough | Rhizoid |
9 | OKAO4.12ia | Circular | 0.4 | butyrous | white | opaque | convex | rough | Entire |
10 | OGOA7.12ia | irregular | 0.4 | friable | cream | translucent | raised | smooth | Entire |
11 | IPOI5.10ia | irregular | 0.5 | friable | white | opaque | raised | dull | Entire |
12 | 0015.10i | irregular | 0.4 | friable | white | translucent | convex | smooth | Entire |
13 | OGOA6.7iia | Circular | 0.3 | friable | white | opaque | raised | dull | circular |
14 | OGOA8.7iia | Circular | 0.5 | friable | white | opaque | raised | smooth | circular |
15 | OOI2.10iic | irregular | 0.2 | butyrous | cream | translucent | raised | smooth | irregular |
16 | OKOI7.12ia | Circular | 0.2 | friable | white | opaque | flat | smooth | fimbriate |
17 | OO13.107 | irregular | 0.2 | butyrous | white | opaque | raised | raised | irregular |
18 | OOI1.7i | Circular | 0.2 | friable | cream | translucent | convex | raised | circular |
19 | OGOA7.12ia | Circular | 0.2 | butyrous | cream | translucent | raised | smooth | circular |
20 | OGOA4.7i | irregular | 0.4 | friable | white | opaque | raised | smooth | irregular |
Table 2: Biochemical and sugar fermentation tests of Bacillus species
S/N | Isolate Code | Gram Reaction | Catalase Test | Hemolysis Test | Endospore Staining | Oxidase | Glucose | Lactose | Fructose | Maltose | D-Mannose |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OO14.7iib | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
2 | OKO17.12ia | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F- G- | F+ G+ |
3 | IPOI3.12ia | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
4 | OO13.10i | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
5 | OOI1.7i | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+G+ | F+ G- | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
6 | OGOA10.7iia | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
7 | IPOI3.12ia | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G- | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
8 | OO13.10i | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
9 | OKAO4.12ia | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
10 | OGOA7.12ia | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G- | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
11 | IPOI5.10ia | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
12 | 0015.10i | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
13 | OGOA6.7iia | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G- | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
14 | OGOA8.7iia | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+G+ | F+ G- | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
15 | OOI2.10iic | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G- | F+ G- | F+ G- | F+ G- | F+ G- |
16 | OKOI7.12ia | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
17 | OO13.107 | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
18 | OOI1.7i | GPR | + | α | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
19 | OGOA7.12ia | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
20 | OGOA4.7i | GPR | + | β | + | - | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ | F+ G+ |
Key: GPR= Gram positive rod; β= Beta hemolysis; α= Alpha hemolysis; F+; G+= positive fermentation and gas production; F-; G--= negative fermentation and gas production
The inhibitory activities of the Bacillus cell-free supernatants against indicator organisms were done using the agar well diffusion method, and the results are documented in Figure 2. Five typed bacterial cultures, namely: E. coli DCM 10974, E. coli ATCC 43816, S enteritidis ATCC 13875, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus NTCC/GP054 and P. stutzeri NTCC/GN029 and two confirmed aflatoxin producing fungal cultures were also used, namely: Aspergillus flavus GB and Aspergillus niger AGM.
Plates 1 and 2 show the growth of A. flavus on PDA. A. flavus is usually identified with its characteristic green color on PDA.
Figure 1 shows the presence of aflatoxin B1 and B2 in the sampled groundnuts.
Figure 2 presents the inhibitory activity of five Bacillus sp. against food-borne indicator organisms. B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia had the highest inhibitory activity against S. enteritidis ATCC 13875, while B. paralicheniformis had the least inhibitory activity against A. niger. B. subtilis OKO17.12ia showed significant antibacterial and antifungal inhibitory activities than the control antibiotics (gentamycin).
B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia had the highest metabolite growth rate at 30oC, followed by B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia and B. paralicheniformis OKAO4.12ia. However, there is no significant difference in the growth rate of B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia at 30oC and 40oC (p < 0.05), as presented in Figure 3.
Figure 3 represents the metabolite growth rate of the five Bacillus sp. used in this study. B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia and B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia had the highest metabolites growth rate at pH 8, while a lower growth rate was observed at pH 6 at p < 0.05.
From Figure 4, Bacillus metabolite growth rates were observed using different carbon and nitrogen sources. B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia and B. subtilis IPOI5.10ia had the highest growth rate using glucose and galactose as carbon sources, respectively. For growth in nitrogen sources, B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia had the highest growth rate, while B. subtilis IPOI5.10ia and B. subtilis OGOA10.7ii are not significantly different at p < 0.05. however, B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia had the least growth in peptone.
Table 4 documents the Bacillus species' production of three (3) enzymes. The clear zones around the spot area on the appropriate growth medium indicate the enzyme's presence. Protease, amylase, and lipase were assayed for in the Bacillus sp. B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia produced the highest amount of protease (25), amylase (27) and lipase (16). However, B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia produced only amylase.
Plate 1: A. flavus GB
Plate 2: A. flavus GB (Reverse side)
Figure 1: Chromatogram showing aflatoxins in groundnut sample
Table 3: Aflatoxin quantification
Sample type | Aflatoxin concentrations (ppb) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Groundnut (milled) | B1 23 |
B2 3 |
G1 0 |
G2 0 |
From the analyzed groundnut samples, the concentrations of aflatoxin B1 and B2 are 23 and 3 ppb, respectively
Figure 2: Inhibitory activities of Bacillus sp. against food-borne indicator organisms
Values are presented as means± standard error of duplicate values.
Figure 3: Bacillus sp. growth at 30oC and 40oC
Values are presented as means±
standard error of duplicate values.
Figure 4: Growth of Bacillus sp. at pH 6 and 8
Values are presented as means± standard error of duplicate values.
Figure 5: Growth of Bacillus sp. in different carbon and nitrogen sources
Values are presented as means± standard error of duplicate values.
Table 4: Protease, amylase, and lipase production by Bacillus species by measuring clear zones around the growth in mm
Bacillus isolates | protease | amylase | Lipase |
---|---|---|---|
B. subtilis IPOI5.10ia | 25.00 | 23.00 | 16.00 |
B. subtilis IPOI3.12ia | - | 19.00 | - |
B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia | 25.00 | 27.00 | 16.00 |
B. paralicheniformis OKAO4.12ia | 23.00 | 22.00 | 18.00 |
B. subtilis OGOA10.7ii | 25.00 | 20.00 | 15.00 |
Food-grade Bacillus species metabolites have been considered safer, cheaper, and biodegradable alternatives to synthetic antimicrobials that can be used as starter cultures during the production of food (Adebo et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2017; Kumariya et al., 2019 and Dabire et al., 2021). Diverse Bacillus species such as B. subtilis, B. paralicheniformis, B. circulans, B. pumilus, B. polymyxa, B. amyloliquefacines, B. sphaericus, B. firmus, B. clausii, B. velezensis, etc. can be isolated from various food samples such as the Nigerian iru, ogiri, ugba, okpehe, and owoh; Burkina-Faso soumbala, maari and bikalga; Benin republic ikpiru, yanyanku, afintin, sonru, netetou, and tayohounta; Cameroon mbuja and Ghana kantong (Parkouda et al., 2015; Sieiro et al., 2016; Ademola et al., 2018; Adewumi et al., 2019, Agbobatinkpo et al., 2019 and Owusu-Kwarteng et al., 2020). However, B. subtilis has been documented to be the most predominant Bacillus species amongst others, which conforms to the reports from this study (Joseph et al., 2013; Aruwa and Olatope, 2015; Dabire et al., 2022). Out of the five (5) Bacillus identified in this study, four (4) belong to the B. subtilis group, in line with the records of previous researchers mentioned above. The antibacterial and antifungal properties of Bacillus species documented in this study shows that B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia had the highest antimicrobial activity against indicator food-borne pathogenic bacteria and fungi namely: E. coli DCM10974, E. coli ATCC 43816, S. enteritidis ATCC 13875, MRSA NIMR/GP054, P.stutzeri NIMR/GN029, A. flavus GB and A. niger AGM. This result aligns with the reports of Youcef-Ali et al. (2014), who stated that B. subtilis had antifungal activity against Candida albicans. Oyedele et al. (2014) also reported the antifungal inhibitory activities of B. subtilis against A. niger, A. flavus, Fusarium oxysporium, and Rhizopus stolonifer ranged from 8.5-22.5; 12.0-24.5; 9.0-18.0 and 10.0-14.0) respectively. According to the reports of Kadaikunnan et al. (2015), the antibacterial antagonistic activity of B. amyloliquefaciens against B. subtilis (ATCC 7972), Enterococcus cloacae (ATCC 29212), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and S. epidermidis (MTCC 3615) was 20.16±0.28, 19.00±0.5, 22.33±0.57 and 29.83±0.76 respectively while the antifungal inhibitory activities was also documented for: A. clavatus, A. fumigates, A.niger, A. oryzae, Curvularia lunata, Fusarium oxysporum, Gibberella moniliformis, Humicola grisea, Penicillium chrysogenum and P. roqueforti. Delgadillo et al. (2018) also documented the antifungal activity of B. subtilis against Rhizoctonia solani. Moving forward, Lu et al. (2018) have previously reported the antibacterial inhibitory zones by B. subtilis against S. aureus, E. coli, Enterococci spp., and Salmonella gallinarum to be in the range of 7.0-10.00, 7.0-12.00, 7.0-11.00. and 6.50-7.50, respectively.
The result of the optimization process for the optimum production of antimicrobial metabolites at different temperatures and pH, involving the use of different carbon and nitrogen sources, shows that the highest production was observed at 30oC and pH 8, using different carbon and nitrogen sources on the growth of Bacillus. Abo-Amer. (2011) documented optimum metabolite growth at 30oC, pH 6.5, 5% lactose, and yeast extract (as carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively), which is a bit different from the results obtained in this study. Delgadillo et al. (2018) also reported that optimum Bacillus metabolite growth occurs mostly at the stationary phase, which involves temperature and pH ranges between 15-37oC and 5-8, respectively. Optimum antimicrobial production was also recorded for B. subtilis isolated from P. biglobosa (iru) at 50oC and pH 9 (Oyeleke et al., 2011).
According to the reports of Danilova and Sharipova (2020), Bacillus subtilis can produce a diverse of enzymes such as amylases, xylanases, lichenase, β-galactosidase, cellulase, proteases, etc., which is in line with the result of enzymatic assays obtained from this study.
From the enzymatic assays carried out on an enzymatic test medium, B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia was observed to show the highest amount of protease (25 mm), amylase (27mm), and lipase (16mm). According to the report of Youcef-Ali et al. (2014) reported the production of protease and cellulase but not chitinase by B. subtilis and B. mojavensis isolated from soils in the arid regions of Algeria showing in mm: 34, 30, and 20, 30 for the production of protease and cellulase by B. subtilis and B. mojavensis respectfully. In addition, Kadaikunnan et al. (2015) documented the production of ornithine decarboxylate by B. amyloliqufaciens and B. subtilis. In addition, cell-wall degrading and digestive enzymes produced by Bacillus isolated from various sources produced different kinds of enzymes, which include amylase, cellulase, protease, lipase, and β-galactosidase (Ananthanarayanan and Dubhashi, 2015). Oyeleke et al. (2011) also documented the synthesis of amylase and protease by B. subtilis isolated from P. biglobosa (iru). Furthermore, Dabire et al. (2022) reported enzymatic activity of 43.00-60.67mm, 22.59-49.55mm, 20.02-24.57 mm, and 0.00-10.67mm for protease, amylase, lipase and tannase by Bacillus species isolated from soumbala in Burkina-Faso.
From the results obtained in this study, Bacillus species, especially the B. subtilis group are predominately responsible for the alkaline fermentation of food condiments with promising technological functions such as enzymes and antimicrobial peptides production. The Bacillus sp. analyzed in this study showed significant inhibitory activities against food-borne indicator organisms of public health significance. Conclusively, B. subtilis OKOI7.12ia was observed to be the most promising Bacillus sp that can be used as a potential starter culture for the production of microbiologically safe food products.
The authors declared no conflict of interest
Abo-Amer AE (2011) Optimization of bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus acidophilus AA11, a strain isolated from Egyptian cheese. Annual Microbiology. 61:445-452. [Crossref]
Abriouel H, Franz CM, Omar NB (2011) Diver¬sity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiology Review. 35:201-232. [Crossref]
Adebo OA, Njobeh PB, Adebiyi JA, Gbashi S, Phoku JZ, Kayitesi E (2017) Fermented pulse-based food products in developing nations as functional foods and ingredients, in: M.C. Hueda (Ed.), Functional Food: Improve Health through Adequate, Food, Intech, Janeza Trdine, Rijeka. 42(1): 77-100. [Crossref]
Ademola OM, Adeyemi TE, Ezeokoli OT, Ayeni KI, Obadina AO, Somorin YM, Omemu AM, Adeleke RA, Nwangburuka CC, Oluwafemi F (2018) Phylogenetic analyses of bacteria associated with the processing of iru and ogiri condiments. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 67 (4):354-62. [Crossref]
Adewumi GS, Grover CI, Oguntoyinbo FA (2019) Phylogenetics, Safety and In Vitro Functional Properties of Bacillus Species Isolated from Iru, a Nigerian Fermented Condiment. Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters. 47 (4):498-508. [Crossref]
Agbobatinkpo BP, Tossou GM, Adinsi L, Akissoe HN, Hounhouigan DJ (2019) Optimal fermentation parameters for process- ing high quality African locust bean condiments. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 56 (10):4648-57. [Crossref]
Aruwa CE, Olatope SOA (2015) Characterization of Bacillus species from convenience foods with conventional and API kit method: A comparative analysis. Journal of Applied Life Sciences International. 3(1): 42-48. [Crossref]
Beladjal L, Gheysens T, Clegg JS, Amar M, Mertens J (2018) Survival of dry bacterial spores after very high temperature exposure. Extremophiles: Life Under Extreme Conditions. 22(5):751-759. [Crossref]
Benitez LB, Velho RV, Lisboa MP, Medina LF, Brandelli A (2010) Isolation and characterization of antifungal peptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LBM5006. Journal of Microbiology. 48:791-797. [Crossref]
Caulier S, Nannan C, Gillis A, Licciardi F, Bragard C, Mahillon J (2019) Overview of the antimicrobial compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Frontiers Microbiology. 10(2):302-310. [Crossref]
Chantawannakul P, Oncharoen A, Klanbut K, Chukeatirote E, Lumyong S (2002) Characterization of proteases of Bacillus subtilis strain 38 isolated from traditionally fermented soybean in Northern Thailand. Science Asia. 28(3):241. [Crossref]
Chopra L, Singh G, Jena K (2015) Sonorensin: a new bacteriocin with potential of an anti-biofilm agent and a food biopreservative. Science Report. 10(5):13412 -13422. [Crossref]
Christie G, Setlow P (2020) Bacillus spore germination: Knowns, unknowns and what we need to learn. Cellular Signalling. 74(2):109729. [Crossref]
Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C (2013) Bacteriocins-a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nature Review in Microbiology. 11(2):95-105. [Crossref]
Cutting SM (2011) Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiology, 28:214-220. [Crossref]
Dabire Y, Somda NS, Compaore CS, Mogmenga I, Somda MK, Ouattara AS, Dicko MH, Ugwuanyi JO, Ezeogu LI, Traore AS (2021) Molecular screening of bacteriocin- producing Bacillus spp. isolated from soumbala, a fermented food condiment from Parkia biglobosa seeds. Scientific African. 12(2021): e000836. [Crossref]
Dabire Y, Somda NS, Somda MK, Compaore CB, Mogmenga I, Ezeogu LI, Traore AS, Ugwuanyi JO, Dicko MH (2022) Assessment of probiotic and technological properties of Bacillus spp. isolated from Burkinabe soumbala. BMC Microbiology. 22(1): 228-241. [Crossref]
Dahiya P, Purkayastha S (2011) Isolation, screening and production of extracellular alkaline lipase from a newly isolated Bacillus sp. PD-12. Journal of Biological Sciences. 11(5):381-7. [Crossref]
Danilova L, Sharipova M (2020) The practical potential of Bacilli and their enzymes for industrial production. Frontiers in Microbiology. 11(2): 1782-90. [Crossref]
Delgadillo RJ, Valdes-Rodriguez SE, Juarez RA, Portugal VO, Hernandez JLG (2018) Effect of pH and temperature on the growth and antagonistic activity of Bacillus subtilis on Rhizoctonia solani. Mexican Journal of Phytopathology. 36(2): 256-275.
Du H, Zhou L, Lu Z, Bie X, Zhao H, Niu YD, Lu F (2020) Transcriptomic and proteomic389 profiling response of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to a novel bacteriocin, 390 plantaricin GZ1-27 and its inhibition of biofilm formation. Applied Microbiology of Biotechnology.104(1):7957-7970. [Crossref]
Eijlander RT, Abee T, Kuipers OP (2011) Bacterial spores in food: How phenotypic variability complicates prediction of spore properties and bacterial behavior. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 22(1):180-186. [Crossref]
Elshaghabee FMF, Rokana N, Gulhane RD, Sharma C, Panwar H (2017) Bacillus as potential probiotics: Status, concerns, and future perspectives. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8(1):1490-6. [Crossref]
Fadahunsi IF, Olubodun S (2021) Antagonistic pattern of yeast species against some selected food-borne pathogens. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 45(1): 34-53. [Crossref]
Fan B, Blom J, Klenk HP, Borriss R (2017) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis form an "operational group B. amyloliquefacien within the B. subtilis species complex. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8 (22): 22-30. [Crossref]
Hashemizadeh Z, Bazargani A, Davarpanah MA (2011) Blood culture contamination in a neonatal intensive care unit in Shiraz, Southwest Central Iran. Medical Principles & Practice. 20(1):133-136. [Crossref]
Huang F, Teng K, Liu Y, Cao Y, Wang T, Ma C, Zhang J, Zhong J (2021) Bacteriocins:400 Potential for human health. Medical Cell Longev. 55(1):882-6. [Crossref]
Jadhav JP, Phugare SS, Dhanve RS, Jadhav SB (2010) Rapid Biodegradation and Decolorization of direct orange 39 (orange TGLL) by an isolated bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain BCH. Biodegradation. 21(1): 453-463. [Crossref]
Javed F, Ali Z, Iqbal S, Ahmed N, Farooq Z, Masood F, Nawaz M (2020) Production of synbiotic product containing galacto-oligosaccharides and saccharomyces boulardii and evaluation of its in-vitro bifidogenic effect. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Science. 43(2):197-200. [Crossref]
Jeong H, Jeong DE, Kim SH, Song GC, Park SY, Ryu CM (2012) Genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus siamensis KCTC 13613T. Journal of Bacteriology. 194 (15):4148-4149. [Crossref]
Jonathan SG, Adeniyi MA, Asemoloye MD (2016) Fungal biodeterioration, aflatoxin contamination and nutrient value of suya spices. Scientifica. 2016(4): 1-6. [Crossref]
Jooste M, Roets F, Midgley GF (2019) Nitrogen-fixing bacteria and Oxalis-evidence for a vertically inherited bacterial symbiosis. BMC Plant Biology. 19(1): 441-9. [Crossref]
Joseph B, Dhas B, Hena V, Raj J (2013) Bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis as a novel drug against diabetic foot ulcer bacterial pathogens. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 3(12): 942-946. [Crossref]
Kadaikunnan S, Rejiniemon TS, Khaled JM, Alharbi NS, Mothana R (2015) Antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant and functional properties of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials. 14(9): 1-11. [Crossref]
Kaškonienė V, Stankevičius M, Bimbiraitė- Survilienė K (2017) Current state of purifica¬tion, isolation and analysis of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria. Applied Micro¬biology & Biotechnology.101(2):1323-1335. [Crossref]
Kaur S (2015) Bacteriocins as potential anticancer agents. Frontial Pharmacology, 6:272. [Crossref]
Kumariya R, Garsab AK, Rajputc YS, Soodc SK, Akhtard N, Patele S (2019) Bacteriocins: classification, synthesis, mechanism of action and resistance development infood spoilage causing bacteria. Microbial Pathogens. 128 (2019) 171-177. [Crossref]
Lu Z, Guo W, Liu C (2018) Isolation, identification and characterization of novel Bacillus subtilis. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 80(3): 427-433. [Crossref]
Noda M, Miyauchi R, Danshiitsoodol N, Matoba Y, Kumagai T, Sugiyama M (2018) Expression of genes involved in bacteriocin production and self-resistance in Lactobacillus brevis 174A is mediated by two regulatory proteins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 84(3):2707-02717. [Crossref]
Olaitan JO, Ozabor PT, Akinde SB, Oluwajide OO, Oyetunji FT, Arogundade NO (2022) Antibacterial effect of Allium sativum (garlic) and Zingiber officinale (ginger) extracts against antibiotic resistant organisms isolated from chicken abattoir. Nigerian Journal of Microbiology. 36(1): 5991-6000.
Owusu-Kwarteng J, Parkouda C, Adewumi GA, Ouoba LII, Jespersen L (2020) Technologically relevant Bacillus species and microbial safety of West African traditional alkaline fermented seed condiments. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 62(4): 871-888. [Crossref]
Oyedele AO, Ogunbanwo TS (2014) Antifungal activities of Bacillus subtilis isolated from some condiments and soil. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 8(18): 184-1849. [Crossref]
Oyeleke SB, Oyewole OA, Egwim EC (2011) Production of protease and amylase from Bacillus subtilis and Aspergillus niger using Parkia biglobosa (African locust beans) as substrate in solid state fermentation. Advances in Life Sciences. 1(2): 49-53. [Crossref]
Panda MK, Sahu MK (2013) Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic Bacillus sp. with protease activity isolated from hot spring of Tarabalo, Odisha, India. Iran Journal of Microbiology. 5(2):159-65 (PMID: 23825735).
Parkouda C, Ba F, Ouattara L, Tano-Debrah K, Diawara B (2015) Biochemical changes associated with the fermentation of bao- bab seeds in Maari: An alkaline fermented seeds condiment from western Africa. Journal of Ethnic Foods. 2 (2):58-63. [Crossref]
Ramesh A, Sharma SK, Sharma MP, Yadav N, Joshi OP (2014) Inoculation of zinc solubilizing Bacillus aryabhattai strains for improved growth, mobilization and biofortification of zinc in soybean and wheat cultivated in Vertisols of central India. Applied Soil Ecology. 73(1):87-96. [Crossref]
Riffat SA, Muhammad A, Mashkoor M, Zafar I (2020) Production and Therapeutic Potential of Bacteriocin produced by indigenous isolates of Bacillus subtilis. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science. 57(5):1403-1411
Ryan KJ, Ray CG (2014) Sherris Medical Microbiology. 4th Edition. McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-8385-8529-0
Savadogo A, Ilboudo AJ, Gnankiné O, Traoré AS (2011) Numeration and identification of thermotolerant endospore-forming Bacillus from two fermented condiments Bikalga and Soumbala. Advance Environmental Biology. 5(9):2960-2966
Schallmey M, Singh A, Ward OP (2014) Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 50(1):1-17. [Crossref]
Sieiro PA, Lopez MM, Mu D, Kuipers OP (2016) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: Extending the family. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 100 (7):2939-51. [Crossref]
Simons A, Alhanout K, Duval RE (2020) Bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides from bacterial397 origin: Overview of their biology and their impact against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Microorganisms.98 (8): 630- 639. [Crossref]
Sivaranjani M, Leskinen K, Aravindraja C, Saavalainen P, Pandian SK, Skurnik M, Ravi A (2019) Deciphering the antibacterial mode of action of alpha-mangostin on Staphylococcus 394 epidermidis RP62A through an integrated transcriptomic and proteomic approach. Frontiers in Microbiology. 395 (10):1-16. [Crossref]
Slonczewski JL, Foster JW, (2011) Microbiology: An Evolving Science. 2nd Edition. Norton.
Suganthi V, Mohanasrinivasan V (2015) Optimization studies for enhanced bacteriocin production by Pediococcus pentosaceus KC692718 using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 52(2):3773-3783. [Crossref]
Todorov SD, Leblanc JG, Franco BD (2012) Evaluation of the probiotic potential and effect of encapsulation on survival for Lactobacillus plantarum ST16Pa isolated from papaya. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 28(1):973-84. [Crossref]
Unban K, Kochasee P, Shetty K, Khanongnuc CL (2020) Tannin-tolerant and extracellular tannase producing Bacillus isolated from traditional fermented tea leaves and their probiotic functional properties. Foods. 9(4):1-14. [Crossref]
War NF, Joshi S (2014) Epiphytic and endophytic bacteria that promote growth of ethnomedicinal plants in the subtropical forests of Meghalaya, India. Revista de Biología Tropical. 62(4):1295-1308. [Crossref]
Yost CK (2014) Biopreservation. Encyclopedia of Meat Science, 76-82. [Crossref]
Youcef-Ali M, Chaouche NK, Dehimat L, Bataiche I, Ali MA, Cawoy H. Thonart P (2014) Antifungal activity and bioactive compounds produced by Bacillus mojavensis and Bacillus subtilis. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 8(6): 476-484. [Crossref]
Zhao X, Kuipers OP (2016) Identification and classification of known and putative antimicrobial compounds produced by a wide variety of Bacillales species. BMC Genomics. 17(1):882-900. [Crossref]