Comparative Biogas production by Anaerobic Digestion Using Sugarcane Bagasse, Cow Dung and Chicken Droppings Obtained from Katsina Metropolis as Substrates

Authors

  • Abdulhamid Mohammed Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry Umaru Musa Yaradua University Katsina.
  • Muazu Batagarawa Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry Umaru Musa Yaradua University Katsina.
  • Kamaluddeen Kabir Department of Microbiology Umaru Musa Yaradua University Katsina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.1942.012

Keywords:

Sugarcane bagasse;, Cow dung;, Chicken dropping;, Slurry.

Abstract

The use of energy derived from fossil raw materials as conventional primary source of energy has led to environmental pollution climate changes. The need for other alternative sources such as energy derived from wind, solar and biofuel has become necessary. This research investigated the generation of biogas from three types of wastes: Sugarcane bagasse, Cow dung, and chicken droppings wastes using three different biogas plants. Batch operation was carried out and the daily gas produced from each digester was monitored for the retention period of four weeks at the ambient and slurry temperatures. The digesters were charged differently with these wastes in the ratio of 1:3 wastes to distilled water. The ambient temperature ranges within the retention period were 17-290C and a slurry temperature range of 19-320C. The result showed that chicken droppings had the highest cumulative biogas yield of 3228.3cm3; cow dung had 2816.6cm3 and sugarcane bagasse had the least cumulative production of 681.4cm3 within digestion period of 30 days. The qualitative test of the generated gas showed that, cow dung has superior quality for biogas production with the highest methane content of 61.3% over the sugarcane bagasse (57.2%) and chicken droppings (47.6%). The bacterial enumeration for chicken droppings was discovered to have highest count of 28.7 x 105cfu/g than cow dung and sugarcane bagasse with 21.2 x 105cfu/g and 2.1 x 105cfu/g respectively. Cow dung was discovered to have the highest total solid content of 84.74% while sugarcane bagasse had the least (8.67%). The utilization of these waste stockscould bean alternative option for energy source and wastes treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulwaheed, A.B. (2015). Chemical composition of sun-dried poultry droppings. Life Sciences International Research Journal, 2 (2): 2347-8691.

AOAC (1990). Official methods of Analysis: Association of analytical chemists 14th Edition Washington, USA.

APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Part 1000. Book: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation (2005)

Bharathiraja, B,. Sudharsana., T. Jyamulhunagai, J. & Rumanujam, P. (2018). A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stocks and principles of anaerobic digestion, A renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 90: 570-582.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093

Chen, W. H., Ye, S. C. & Sheen, H. K. (2012). Hydrolysis characteristics of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by dilute acid solution in a microwave irradiation environment, Journal of applied energy, 93: 237-244.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.014

Eze, J. I. (2000). Design, Construction and Performance testing of batch operated biogas plant using agricultural residue. Thesis submitted to the department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Martı́n, C., Galbe, M., Wahlbom, C.F., Hahn-Hägerdal, B. & Jönsson, L.J. (2002). Ethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysates of sugarcane bagasse using recombinant xylose- utilising Saccharomyces cerevisiae", Enzyme and microbial technology, 31 (3) :274-282.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00112-6

Onwuliri, F.C., Onyimba, I.A & Nwaukwu, I.A. (2013). Generation of biogas from cow Dung, Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 18 (10): 002,

Ozor, O.C., Agah, M.V., Ogbu, K.I., Nnachi, A.U., Udu-ibiam, O.U. & Agwu M.M. (2014). Biogas production using cow dung from Abakaliki abattoir in south-eastern Nigeria, International journal of scientific & technology, vol. 3 (10): 2277-8616.

Pandey, A., Soccol, C.R., Nigam, P. & Soccol, V.T. (2000).Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: sugarcane bagasse, Bioresource technology, 74 (1):69-80.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00142-X

Stephen, C., Ukpabi, C. & Esihe, T. (2013). Anaerobic digester considerations of animal Waste, American Journal of Biochemistry, 3 (4): 93-96.

Ukpai,A. & Nnabuchi, M. N. (2012). Comparative study of biogas production from cow dung, cow pea and cassava peeling using 45 litres biogas digester.Advance Journal of Applied Science ,3 (3): 864-1869.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2019

How to Cite

Abdulhamid Mohammed, Muazu Batagarawa, & Kamaluddeen Kabir. (2019). Comparative Biogas production by Anaerobic Digestion Using Sugarcane Bagasse, Cow Dung and Chicken Droppings Obtained from Katsina Metropolis as Substrates. UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR), 4(2), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.1942.012