Bioethanol Production from Citrus limon (Citrus) Peel Substrate Using Aspergillus Niger and Saccharomyces Cerevisae

Authors

  • Baba, H. P. Department of Integrated Science, Federal College of Education (Technical) (FCET), Gombe, Nigeria
  • Bukar, A. Department of Microbiology Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
  • Kawo, A. H. Department of Microbiology Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.2493.062

Keywords:

Aspergillus niger, Bioethanol, Citrus limon, Optimization, Saccharomyces cerevisae

Abstract

Study’s Excerpt

  • An approach to optimizing bioethanol production from lemon peel waste is presented.
  • A combination of Aspergillus niger for enzymatic hydrolysis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fermentation were employed and specific physicochemical conditions—such as a pH of 3.5, temperature of 30°C, and 96-hour fermentation period—that maximize bioethanol yield and fermentation efficiency were highlighted.
  • Citrus limon peel has a potential of becoming sustainable bioethanol source that could contributes to renewable energy development.

Full Abstract

The consumption of petroleum products is marred by the inconveniences of environmental pollution and the emission of greenhouse gases, which are responsible for global warming.  Excessive use of fossil fuel has resulted in climate change, the elevation of the greenhouse gas effect, etc., contributing to the search for renewable sources of energy in harmony with the world’s energy needs.  Although bioconversion of lignocellulose residue has received much attention, most plant biomass has not been fully exploited to meet human energy needs.  Among these alternative energy carriers, ethanol receives great attention.   This study aims to determine the optimal conditions for the production of bioethanol from lemon peel using Aspergillus Niger and Saccharomyces cerevisae.  Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were isolated using the streak plate method and identified macroscopically and microscopically.  The cellulose hemicellulose and lignin contents of the substrates were determined, and after that, the substrates were pretreated with 5% sulfuric acid and then subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis using Aspergillus niger.  Subsequently, the reducing sugar content of the hydrolysate was determined, followed by fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisae.  The percentage of bioethanol produced, as well as the fermentation efficiency (%), were calculated.  Analysis of Variance was employed to determine statistically significant differences among the determined parameters.    The cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents of Citrus Limon were found to be 32.00%, 4.99%, and 9.80%.  Pretreatment increased the cellulose content from 23.00% to 32.00%.  The highest reducing sugar content, 6.63 g/L,, was recorded after hydrolysis for 96 hours.  Fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisae yielded 19.20% of bioethanol from Citrus limon with a fermentation efficiency of 38.42%, respectively.  The Optimum fermentation conditions recorded were a time of 96hrs, pH of 3.5, temperature of 30oC and amount of substrate of 15g.    The combination of these parameters produced a bioethanol yield of (22.90%) and a fermentation efficiency of 44.44%, respectively.  This research revealed the potential of Citrus limon peel waste as a substrate for bioethanol production and optimized the physicochemical parameters for the fermentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ado, S.A, Olukotun C.B, Amel-JB Yahaya A, (2019). Bioconversion of Cassava starch to ethanol in a simultaneous scarification and fermentation process by cocultures O A. Mger and S. Cerevisae Sci. W.J. 2009 19-22

Ajeet, K.S. Pushpa, A. and Abdul, R. (2014) Delignification of rice husk and production of bioethanol. International journal of innovative research in science engineer and technology 3-2319-8753.

AOAC, (2012). Official method of analysis 14th edition Association of official analytical chemistry, washing ton DC, Arlington, virginna USA.

Asma M., Ziaullah K. Athar H., and Ahmad S. (2019). Dilute Sulfuric Acid. A Cheap Acid Aspergillus Oxgen Isolate for Xylanese Biosynthesis Biotechnology Research Laboratory, Department of Botany Government College University Lahore, Pakistan. 185-190.

Balat, M. Balat H. (2018). Recent Trend, In Global Production and Utilization of Bioethanol Fuel. Applied Energy 86(11): 2273-2282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.015

Boluda Aguila, M.(2010). Mandarin peel waste, pretreatment with steam explosion for bioethanol production. Bioresource technology, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.063

Broda, K., Vyas, P. Dube A, V Padhaya CP Kothai R, T Yagi V, V and Kumar R, (2022). Assessment of different pretreatment technologies for efficient bioconversion of lignin cellulose to ethanol biosci: 10 (52) 10-27

Gashaw, N., Pakula, T., and Pantetia, M.F. (2015). Transcriptional Regulation. Q£ PlansGel Wen‖ Degradation by Filamentous Fungi. Fem, Microbiology Revolution. 29: 719-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.006

Gupta R. P, Gigras H, mahapatra, VK, Goshwahi and B. Chauhan (2014): Microbial and amylase process Biochen 38: 1599-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00053-0

Hamed I. Hamouda, Hussein N. Nassar Hekmat R. Madian, Salem S. Abu Amr and Nour Sh. El Gendy (2015). Response Surface Optimization of Bioethanol from Sugarcane Molasses By Pichia Veronae Strain HSC - 22 Biotechnology Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/905792

Jaisamut, K., Panlova, L., Patakova, P. Rychtera, M., and Melzoch, K. (2014) Optimization Of Akali Pretreatment Of Wheat Straw To Be Used As Substrate For Biofuels Production Plant Soil Environment 59(12); 537-542. https://doi.org/10.17221/7129-PSE

Julia, F. Morton (2015). Lemon in Fruits of Warm Climates Purdue University. Pp 160-168 Kims, Dale B.E Global Potential Bioethanol Production From Wasted Crops And Crop Residues.Biomass And Bioenergy 2004; 26: 361-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.002

Kaur, A (2017) Approaches to agro-industrial solid waste and bio energy generation. Advances, in environmental biotechnology 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4041-2_11

Khokhar, U.Z, Syedo, Wadeem. Baig S, MI, Gull I Azam, S. Samira Q. (2020). Deligrifition of wheat straw with acid anhydrous steam under pressure sci J. 11(12) 2010.

Madika,D.Peculyte, M. Kim,D. (2020) Isolation of cellulosis fungi from waste paper gradual recycle materials 5(4): 11-18

Molnar S. (2015). Fermentation of soybean hulls to ethanol while preserving protein value bio resources technol. 2009, 2010.

Oyedepo, M. (2020). Environmental aspect of ethanol derived from notilled corn grain: non- renewable energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission. Biomass and bioenergy 2815L 475.

Oyeleke, S.B, And Jibrin, N.M, (2017) Production Of Bioethanol From Guinea Corn Husk And Millet Husk. African Journal of Microbiology Resource, 3(4): 147-152.

Rabah A, Oyeleke S. Manga S. and Hassan I (2011). Utilization of millet and guinea corn husk for bioethanol production Ajoi. Research (31) 5721-5724 African Journal of Microbiology research Ajol.

Rouchas B, Gupta R, and Khase VP (2017). Bioethanol production from lignocelluloses, an overview in wealth from waste 3rd edition Banwarilal and Priyanghsu m Sharma edition.

Sharma, S.K, Kalra, K.L and Kochey G.S (2004). Fermentation Of Enzymatic Hydrolysate Of Sunflower Hulls For Bioethanol Production And Its Scale Up. 27: 399-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.03.005

Wong Y.C and V. Sanggari (2014) Bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse using fermentation process 20(20) 0970-0209.

Zakpaa, H.D. Mak-mensa, EE, F.S (2009) production of bioethanol from corncob using A. Mgerand S. cerevisae in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. African journal of biotechnology 8(13) 3018-3022.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2024

How to Cite

Baba, H. P., Bukar, A., & Kawo, A. H. (2024). Bioethanol Production from Citrus limon (Citrus) Peel Substrate Using Aspergillus Niger and Saccharomyces Cerevisae . UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR), 9(3), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.2493.062