Biogas Production using Different Wastes: A Review

Authors

  • Sani Aliyu Department of Microbiology Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Umaru Musa Yar‟Adua University, Katsina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.1942.013

Keywords:

Biogas,, Substrate,, Digestion,, Microbial,, and Cellulose.

Abstract

Biogas as a renewable energy has recently been receiving attention. This is due to its numerous advantages specifically in energy source and waste treatment etc. Several challenges including amount of gas produce, nature of substrates and factors affecting production remains a problem. Hence this review is aimed at investigating different wastes used in biogas production (nature of substrates), amount of gas produced and factors that made a remarkable impact on the outcome of the production. In this review stages of biogas production, purification of biogas, biomass (substrate) pretreatment, classes of wastes used in biogas and their various outcomes, setting the anaerobic digester, factors influencing the rate biogas production and the biogas industry had been extensively reviewed. It was discovered that different substrates produced different amount of biogas. A substrate with less polysaccharide e.g cellulose and higher microbial population produces more gas than substrates with high polysaccharide and less microbial population. This is clearly due to the fact that biogas is a by-product of microbial activities; higher number of the microbes will increase gas production. Substrate with high polysaccharide have slower digestion rate than those with less polysaccharide. Hence these and other factors should be considered before making the choice of substrate to be used.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badiyya, H. M. (2018). Comparative study of biogas production from sugarcane bagasse and cow dung. UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research, 3(2), pp. 127-131.

Fatima, M., Aliyu, A., Ummasalma, A. S. and Hadiza, G. (2018). Biogas production from cow dung for substantial energy generation. UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research 3(1), pp. 81-85.

Gumel, S.M. and Yaro, M.N. (2015). Generation of biogas from maize cob and analysis of the combustible component of the biogas using flame ionization detector (FID). Dutse journal of Pure and Applied sciences 1(1), pp 90-95

Gumel, S.M. and Yaro, M.N. (2013). Production and analysis of biogas from varying concentrations of chicken droppings. Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal for the Tropics 10(3), pp. 109-110.

Harka, M. L., Amrit, B. K. and Jagan, N. S. (2010). Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of biodegradable household wastes. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology 11, pp. 167-172.

https://doi.org/10.3126/njst.v11i0.4140

Ilona, S.H., Meisam, T., Keikhosro, K. and Rajeev k. (2016). Recent update on biogas production - a review. Biofuel research journal 10, pp. 394-402.

https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2016.3.2.4

Nabila, L. and Nawel N. (2015). Comparative study for biogas production from different wastes. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, 7(3), pp. 39-46.

https://doi.org/10.14257/ijbsbt.2015.7.4.05

Elaiyaraju P. and Partha N. (2016). Studies on biogas production by anaerobic process using agro industrial wastes. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-TechnologyVol. 62, pp 73-82.

https://doi.org/10.17221/65/2013-RAE

Sanusi, A., Abdulkadir, B. and Baki, A.S. (2017). Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Biogas Production from Mixture of Animal Waste and Water Lettuce. UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research 2(2), pp. 125-128.

Segagi, B. S., B. Garba and N. S., Usman. (2009). Studies on biogas production from fruits and vegetable waste. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 2(1), pp. 115-118.

https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v2i1.58513

Tamilarasan, K. and Vimala, E. A. (2019). Biomass pretreatment for enhance of biogas production.Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(1), pp. 215-218.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2019

How to Cite

Sani Aliyu. (2019). Biogas Production using Different Wastes: A Review. UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR), 4(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.1942.013